What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
advantages agricultural basis become capital capitalist capitalist class capitalist society cent Chap child labor civilization class struggle commodities Communist Manifesto competition Congress cooperative criticism demand democracy economic interpretation efficiency elected equal Erfurt program establishments ethical evils exchange-value existence exploitation fact factory farm forces human ideal important income increase individual industry interests International involves Karl Marx labor power labor-power large number leaders living manufacture marginal utility Marx and Engels Marxian Marxian theory means of production ment monopoly nature organization Owen ownership persons political possible poverty present principle private property production and exchange profit proletariat public ownership reforms regarded relative result Social Democratic social evolution social labor Socialist Labor Party Socialist movement Socialist Party stage standard supply surplus-value theory of value things tion to-day trade unions United use-value Utopian vote wages wealth workers
Page 215 - The first act in which the state really comes forward as the representative of society as a whole — the taking possession of the means of production in the name of society — is at the same time its last independent act as a state.
Page 320 - And here it becomes evident that the bourgeoisie is unfit any longer to be the ruling class in society, and to impose its conditions of existence upon society as an overriding law. It is unfit to rule, because it is incompetent to assure an existence to its slave within his slavery, because it cannot help letting him sink into such a state that it has to feed him, instead of being fed by him.
Page 100 - Manifesto being our joint production, I consider myself bound to state that the fundamental proposition which forms its nucleus, belongs to Marx. That proposition is: that in every historical epoch, the prevailing mode of economic production and exchange, and the social organization necessarily following from it, form the basis upon which is built up, and from which alone can be explained, the political and intellectual history of that epoch...
Page 78 - At a certain stage of their development, the material forces of production in society come in conflict with the existing relations of production...
Page 123 - The real price of every thing, what every thing really costs to the man who wants to acquire it, is the toil and trouble of acquiring it.
Page 157 - Centralisation of the means of production and socialisation of labour at last reach a point where they become incompatible with their capitalist integument. This integument is burst asunder. The knell of capitalist private property sounds. The expropriators are expropriated.
Page 105 - We rarely hear, it has been said, of the combinations of masters, though frequently of those of workmen. But whoever imagines, upon this account, that masters rarely combine, is as ignorant of the world as of the subject. Masters are always and everywhere in a sort of tacit, but constant and uniform, combination, not to raise the wages of labour above their actual rate.
Page 319 - The modern laborer, on the contrary, instead of rising with the progress of industry, sinks deeper and deeper below the conditions of existence of his own class. He becomes a pauper, and pauperism develops more rapidly than population and wealth.
Page 106 - They are desperate and act with the folly and extravagance of desperate men who must either starve or frighten their masters into an immediate compliance with their demands. The masters, upon these occasions, are just as clamorous upon the other side, and never cease to call aloud for the assistance of the civil magistrate and the rigorous execution of those laws which have been enacted with so much severity against the combinations of servants, labourers, and journeymen.
Page 7 - My stand-point, from which the evolution of the economic formation of society is viewed as a process of natural history, can less than any other make the individual responsible for relations whose creature he socially remains, however much he may subjectively raise himself above them.