When Government Speaks: Politics, Law, and Government Expression in America
Government's ever-increasing participation in communication processes, Mark Yudof argues, threatens key democratic values that the First Amendment was designed to protect. Government control over the exchange of ideas and information would be inconsistent with citizen autonomy, informed consent, and a balanced and mutually responsive relationship between citizens and their government. Yet the danger of government dominance must be weighed against the necessary role of government in furthering democratic values by proposing and promotion policies and by disseminating information and educating citizens. Restraints on government's ability to control communications processes are desirable, but excessive or inappropriate restrictions threaten democracy. Professor Yudof identifies a number of formal and informal checks on government as disseminator, withholder, and controller of ideas and information. Where more controls are needed, the strengthening of pluralism and legislative oversight is generally the answer. Constitutional redress in the courts should be sought only in extreme instances, he cautions, to avoid judicial interference with legitimate policy objectives.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Government Communication and
17 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
ability action activities advertising agencies Amendment American analysis appears association attitudes audience authority behavior Board branch Broadcasting campaigns choice citizens communications complexity concern Congress consent constitutional corporations danger decisions democracy democratic difficult discussion doctrine Education effect efforts election example executive fact federal freedom function funds government communications government expression government speech government's groups hearing held important individual influence institutions interest involved issues judgment judicial Justice Law Review legislative limits majority mass mass media matter means ment messages nature networks noted notion officials operate opinion organizations particular parties perhaps persuasion pluralism political present President Press problem programs propaganda protection public schools question reasons relationship require response result role rule seek social society stations structure Supreme Court teachers theory tion United University University Press values York