The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific AgeAs a staff writer for Scientific American, John Horgan has a window on contemporary science unsurpassed in all the world. Who else routinely interviews the likes of Lynn Margulis, Roger Penrose, Francis Crick, Richard Dawkins, Freeman Dyson, Murray Gell-Mann, Stephen Jay Gould, Stephen Hawking, Thomas Kuhn, Chris Langton, Karl Popper, Steven Weinberg, and E. O. Wilson, with the freedom to probe their innermost thoughts? This is the secret fear that Horgan pursues throughout this remarkable book: Have the big questions all been answered? Has all the knowledge worth pursuing become known? Will there be a final theory of everything that signals the end? Is the age of great discoveries behind us? Is science today reduced to mere puzzle solving and adding details to existing theories? Scientists have always set themselves apart from other scholars in the belief that they do not construct the truth, they discover it. Their work is not interpretation but simple revelation of what exists in the empirical universe. But science itself keeps imposing limits on its own power. Special relativity prohibits the transmission of matter or information at speeds faster than that of light; quantum mechanics dictates uncertainty; and chaos theory confirms the impossibility of complete prediction. Meanwhile, the very idea of scientific rationality is under fire from Neo-Luddites, animal-rights activists, religious fundamentalists, and New Agers alike. As Horgan makes clear, perhaps the greatest threat to science may come from losing its special place in the hierarchy of disciplines, being reduced to something more akin to literary criticism as more and more theoreticians engage in the theory twiddling hecalls ironic science. Still, while Horgan offers his critique, grounded in the thinking of the world's leading researchers, he offers homage, too. If science is ending, he maintains, it is only because it has done its work so well. |
Contents
Searching for The Answer | 1 |
The End of Progress | 9 |
The End of Philosophy | 32 |
The End of Cosmology | 92 |
The End of Evolutionary Biology | 114 |
The End of Social Science | 143 |
The End of Neuroscience | 159 |
The End of Chaoplexity | 191 |
Murray GellMann denies the existence of something else | 216 |
The End of Limitology | 227 |
Pondering The Limits of Scientific Knowledge in Santa | 244 |
The Terror of God | 261 |
Loose Ends | 267 |
Acknowledgments | 282 |
Selected Bibliography | 309 |
Christopher Langton and the poetry of artificial life | 207 |
Other editions - View all
The End Of Science: Facing The Limits Of Knowledge In The Twilight Of The ... John Horgan Limited preview - 2015 |
Common terms and phrases
answer argued asked basic behavior believe big bang biologists Bohm brain called Chaitin chaoplexity chaos Chomsky complexity consciousness cosmologists cosmology Crick critics Darwin Darwinian Dawkins Dennett discovered discovery Dyson Edelman evolution evolutionary biology existence explain Feigenbaum Feyerabend final theory Francis Crick galaxies Geertz Gell-Mann genetic Glashow going Golden Age Gould Gunther Stent Hoyle human ideas infinite intelligence interview ironic science Kauffman knowledge Kuhn limits Linde machines Margulis Marvin Minsky mathematical McGinn mind Minsky modern Moravec mysterian mystery natural selection neural never Nobel Omega Point paradigm particle physicists particle physics Penrose phenomena philosophers Popper predictions Prigogine problems punctuated equilibrium quantum mechanics questions reality replied Roger Penrose Rossler Santa Fe Institute Scientific American scientists seemed sense simulations sociobiology solve Steven Weinberg Stuart Kauffman suggested superstring theory there's things thought tion Tipler truth understand unified theory University Press Weinberg Wheeler Wilson Witten York