Geometric Programming Prediction of Design Trends for OMV Protective StructuresNational Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Management, Scientific and Technical Information Division, 1990 - Geometric programming - 14 pages |
Common terms and phrases
1.0 Honeycomb Core a₁ a2 a₂ a4 for various area and a4 area exponent a4 Area Exponent Figure area versus honeycomb areas versus impact design variables dual problem dual variables facing sheet mass-density facing sheet material function of a4 geometric programming dual geometric programming optimization Geometric Programming Prediction globally optimal honeycomb core mass honeycomb core ratio honeycomb panel Impact System Constant independent variable K₁ linear constraints Marshall Space Flight mass per unit max v(8 minimum system mass monotonically decreasing monotonically increasing NASA Notation for honeycomb OMV Protective Structures Optimal first sheet Optimal honeycomb core optimal mass Optimal second sheet Performing Organization posynomial Prediction of Design problem formulations ratio versus honeycomb reduce the number second facing sheet second sheet mass second sheet ratio sheet ratio versus space debris Space Flight Center Technical Memorandum Trends for OMV unit area exponent unit area versus values of a₁ versus honeycomb core versus impact system аг