What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action administration affidavit alleged appears application attorney authority Bank bill bond cause certiorari charge CHARLTON Chatham County cited claim clerk common law complainant considered Constitution contract corporation counsel Court of Equity court of ordinary creditors debt debtor deceased decision declared deed defendant discharge duties entitled equity escheat evidence execution executor fact felony fendant fraud Georgia given granted ground habeas corpus Ibid indictment Inferior Court injunction intention interest intestate issue Jail Jared Irwin John John Bolton Judge judgment judicial jurisdiction justice land Legislature levy liable lien ment Minutes of Superior mortgage motion negroes objection opinion party payment person Petit Jury plaintiff plea possession principle prisoner proceedings promise question record remedy rule Savannah Sheriff slaves special jury statute statute of Ann sufficient suit Superior Court term testator testimony tion trial verdict vested witness writ
Page 270 - That the framers of the constitution did not intend to restrain the States in the regulation of their civil institutions, adopted for internal government, and that the instrument they have given us is not to be so construed, may be admitted.
Page 40 - Laws made to punish for actions done before the existence of such laws, and which have not been declared crimes by preceding laws, are unjust, oppressive, and inconsistent with the fundamental principles of a free government.
Page 235 - And it appears in our books, that in many cases, the common law will control acts of parliament, and sometimes adjudge them to be utterly void ; for when an act of parliament is against common right and reason, or repugnant, or impossible to be performed, the common law will control it, and adjudge such act to be void ; and therefore in 8 E 330 ab Thomas Tregor's case on the statutes of W.
Page 414 - And no civil suit shall be brought before either of said courts against an inhabitant of the United States, by any original process in any other district than that whereof he is an inhabitant, or in which he shall be found at the time of serving the writ...
Page 236 - We know of no case, in which a legislative act to transfer the property of A to B, without his consent, has ever been held a constitutional exercise of legislative power in any State in the Union. On the contrary, it has been constantly resisted as inconsistent with just principles, by every judicial tribunal in which it has been attempted to be enforced.
Page 268 - The provision of the constitution never has been understood to embrace other contracts than those which respect property or some object of value, and confer rights which may be asserted in a court of justice.
Page 3 - Co. of the said district, have deposited in this office the title of a book, the right whereof they claim as proprietors, in the words following, to wit : " Tadeuskund, the Last King of the Lenape. An Historical Tale." In conformity to the Act of the Congress of the United States...
Page 264 - The principle asserted is, that one legislature is competent to repeal any act which a former legislature was competent to pass ; and that one legislature cannot abridge the powers of a succeeding legislature. The correctness of this principle, so far as respects general legislation, can never be controverted But, if an act be done under a law, a succeeding legislature cannot undo it. The past cannot be recalled by the most absolute power.
Page 40 - There is still a more unreasonable method than this, which is called making of laws ex post facto ; when after an action, indifferent in itself, is committed, the legislator then for the first time declares it to have been a crime, and inflicts a punishment upon the person who has committed it.