Laws and Lawmakers: Science, Metaphysics, and the Laws of Nature
What distinguishes laws of nature from ordinary facts? What are the "lawmakers": the facts in virtue of which the laws are laws? How can laws be necessary, yet contingent? Lange provocatively argues that laws are distinguished by their necessity, which is grounded in primitive subjunctive facts, while also providing a non-technical and accessible survey of the field.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
AB interactions acceleration accidents actual laws alaw argument Best System Bill Gates body’s trajectory broadly logical truths causal chance chapter conservation laws conversational context Coulomb’s law counterfactual antecedent counterfactual conditionals counterfactual suppositions decay deterministic laws electrons energy conservation Euthyphro exactly example explain first–order laws force laws genuine given gold cube havebeen haveheld holds Humean instantaneous velocity inthe invariance itis lawhood lawmakers lawsare lawthat Lewis Lewis’s logical consequence logically consistent logically entails meta–laws metaphysical metaphysical necessities natural laws natural necessity nested counterfactuals Newton’s nomically stable nonmaximal ofthe onthe ontologically orange shirt philosophers possess possible world preserved primitive prunes range of counterfactual relation to counterfactuals relative modality relevant set’s species statcoulombs sub nomically sub–nomic truths sub–nomically stable set subjunctive conditionals subjunctive facts subjunctivefacts subnomic facts suchas Suppose symmetry principles thatis thatthe thefact thelaws theset time–displacement tobe tothe true universe’s variety of necessity withthe wouldhave wouldstill