A Clear Account of the Ancient Episcopacy: Proving it to Have Been Parochial, and Therefore Inconsistent with the Present Model of Diocesan Episcopacy. Wherein the Several Pretentions for the Divine Right of the Latter are Fully Examin'd. And Mr. Boyse's Sermon Concerning the Scriptural Bishop, and the Postscript to it are Defended Against Mr. Drury's Vindication of His Answer to It. To which are Added, Some Reflections on Mr. Whiston's Citation of Clemens's Epistle, in Favour of the Pretended Constitutions of the Apostles, Showing that from Their Disagreement Upon this Head of Episcopacy, Those Constitutions Plainly Appear Spurious
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
againſt alſo Anſw Anſwer Apoſtles Argument aſſert Aſſiſtance Authority becauſe Biſhops and Presbyters byters call'd Caſe Cauſe Cenſure Chriſt Chriſtian Chriſtian Church Clemens Clergy Commiſſion Congregation Conſent conſider conſiſtent Conſtitutions copacy Corinth cou’d Deacons deſire Dioceſan Biſhop Dioceſan Epiſcopacy Dioceſs diſtinct diſtinguiſh Divine Right Eccleſiaſtical Epheſus Epiſcopacy Epiſcopal Epiſtle Excommunication exerciſe ferome Firſt Flock Goſpel Government himſelf Ibid Ignatius inconſiſtent Inſtitution Jeſus leaſt leſs meer mention'd Miniſters Miniſtry moſt muſt neceſſary Number obſerve Occaſion Office ordain’d Order Ordination Pariſh Parochial Biſhops particular Church Paſſage Paſtors Perſons Power Presby Presbytery preſent Preſident pretend Prieſts Primitive Purpoſe Reāor Reaſon reſpect reſt ſaid ſaith ſame ſay Scripture ſee ſeems ſelf Senſe ſent ſet ſettled ſeveral ſhall ſhew ſhewn ſhop ſhou'd ſignifies ſince ſingle ſome ſpeaks Succeſſors ſuch ſufficient ſuppos'd ſuppoſe Teſtimony themſelves theſe thoſe Timothy Titus underſtand unleſs Uſe whoſe wou'd