Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire
At the time of its first appearance in 1985 Between Men was viewed as an important intervention into Feminist as well as Gay and Lesbian studies. It was an important book because it argued that "sexuality" and "desire" were not a historical phenomenon but carefully managed social constructs. This insight (that actually originated with Michael Foucault) is often viewed as anti-humanist or post-humanist because it argues that men and women are simply the products of patriarchal power relations over which they have no control. By mobilizing Foucault's theories of the history of sexuality Sedgwick re-fashions Feminism and Gay and Lesbian Studies to make it seem as though Feminism and Gay and Lesbian studies are ideally situated to continue those interventions into the history of sexuality begun by Foucault.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Gender Asymmetry and Erotic Triangles
Swan in Love The Example of Shakespeares Sonnets
The Country Wife Anatomies of Male Homosocial Desire
A Sentimental Journey Sexualism and the Citizen of the World
Toward the Gothic Terrorism and Homosexual Panic
Murder Incorporated Confessions of a Justified Sinner
Tennysons Princess One Bride for Seven Brothers
Adam Bede and Henry Esmond Homosocial Desire and the Historicity of the Female
Other editions - View all
active already apparently aristocratic becomes begin body bonds century chapter course critics culture described desire Dickens discussion distinct economic effect English entire erotic Esmond exchange fact father feel female feminism feminist finally force Friend gender give Gothic hand Henry heterosexual historical homophobia homophobic homosocial desire ideological important instance interest Jasper lady least less Letters look male homosexuality male homosocial meaning Misogyny mother Mutual narrative nature needs never novel object offer particular perhaps person play pleasure plot political position present Princess question readers reading relation relationship relatively represents Robert role scene seems seen sense sexual social society Sonnets status structure suggested Symonds texts thematic thing thought tion turn Whitman whole wife woman women writing Yorick young youth