Conducting insanity evaluations
Insanity evaluations represent the most challenging and complex evaluations in forensic psychology and psychiatry. Mental health and legal professionals involved in insanity cases need a solid foundation in current concepts, legal standards, and clinical methods. This need is heightened by the substantial legal and clinical changes that have occurred in the field during the past decade. This text from two leading authorities brings forensic professionals up to date on key issues surrounding insanity evaluations. It provides explicit, research-based guidelines for interview-based assessments, psychological testing and other specialized procedures, and forensic reports and testimony. The volume explores how insanity is conceptualized under the law and differentiated from other standards of criminal responsibility. A range of clinical measures and techniques are examined, with special attention to such relevant phenomena as malingering and amnesia. Included in the appendices are invaluable databases on 413 defendants evaluated for criminal responsibility and 6,479 defendants found not guilty by reason of insanity. For clinicians, the volume provides the knowledge and skills needed to conduct ethical, legally defensible insanity evaluations and to present their findings effectively. Legal professionals will gain a basis for understanding the logic and clinical methods used by mental health experts and for evaluating the quality of their assessments.
43 pages matching interviews in this book
Results 1-3 of 43
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Clinicians Role in Insanity Evaluations
Addressing the Legal Standards
Malingering and Deception
11 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
ability abnormalities abuse addition alcohol American American Law Institute American Psychiatric Association amnesia amnestic amphetamine antisocial personality disorders attempting attorney bizarre behavior clinical data clinically evaluated clinician may wish cognitive component corroborative court crime criminal behavior criminal responsibility evaluations criteria CT scans deception decision defendant's self-report degree delusions diagnostic disease drug emotional empirical epilepsy establishing examined example expert factors forensic clinician forensic evaluations functioning Further GBMI standard hallucinations individual's individuals insanity defense insanity evaluations interpretations interviews intoxication involves issue of criminal Journal Luria-Nebraska M'Naghten standard malingering memory mental disorder mental illness MMPI neuropsychological NGRI offense opinion patients personality potential psychiatric psychogenic psychogenic amnesia psychological impairment psychometric psychopathology psychosis psychotic question R-CRAS regarding relationship relevant reliability reported Rogers role Rorschach scales schizophrenic scoring sexual sodium amytal specific studies suggested symptoms syndrome testosterone tion utilized validity volitional XYY karyotype