The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life After Death
Because every single one of us will die, most of us would like to know what—if anything—awaits us afterward, not to mention the fate of lost loved ones. Given the nearly universal vested interest in deciding this question in favor of an afterlife, it is no surprise that the vast majority of books on the topic affirm the reality of life after death without a backward glance. But the evidence of our senses and the ever-gaining strength of scientific evidence strongly suggest otherwise.
In The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life after Death, Michael Martin and Keith Augustine collect a series of contributions that redress this imbalance in the literature by providing a strong, comprehensive, and up-to-date casebook of the chief arguments against an afterlife. Divided into four separate sections, this collection opens with a broad overview of the issues, as contributors consider the strongest evidence of whether or not we survive death—in particular the biological basis of all mental states and their grounding in brain activity that ceases to function at death. Next, contributors consider a host of conceptual and empirical difficulties that confront the various ways of “surviving” death—from bodiless minds to bodily resurrection to any form of posthumous survival. Then essayists turn to internal inconsistencies between traditional theological conceptions of an afterlife—heaven, hell, karmic rebirth—and widely held ethical principles central to the belief systems supporting those notions. In the final section, authors offer critical evaluations of the main types of evidence for an afterlife.
Fully interdisciplinary, The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life after Death brings together a variety of fields of research to make that case, including cognitive neuroscience, philosophy of mind, personal identity, philosophy of religion, moral philosophy, psychical research, and anomalistic psychology. As the definitive casebook of arguments against life after death, this collection is required reading for any instructor, researcher, and student of philosophy, religious studies, or theology. It is sure to raise provocative issues new to readers, regardless of background, from those who believe fervently in the reality of an afterlife to those who do not or are undecided on the matter.
What people are saying - Write a review
Yeah I read it and used it as a reference in a "death and the afterlife" graduate course essay to prove its error, and lack of factual basis. I was not impressed with the points that Augustine used, and the points that he omitted. The main question that he can't answer is the fact that consciousness continues after one is declared dead; no brain activity, no heartbeat, and no breathing, yet the revived one is able to tell of events they could not have known. The fact remains that we were created eternal beings, and we are more than physical composition.Augustine denies the existence of the soul and the Creator. Interdisciplinary study is a "house of cards" and falls down under scrutiny. Religious Studies that deny the Creator and soul are efforts in futility, excuses to justify no accounting for wrong actions. The Psalmist answered the question best, "Why has the fool said in his heart there is no God?" He does not believe there will be an accounting of his life's actions.
Dedicated attack against the idea of an afterlife, basically an anti-religious, anti-spiritual hit piece.