In the Anglo-Arab Labyrinth: The McMahon-Husayn Correspondence and its Interpretations 1914-1939
The McMahon-Husayn correspondence has been at the heart of Anglo-Arab relations since World War I. It aroused great controversy, particularly over Palestine. Here, it is examined in historical context to determine why it was so obscure and what lay in the minds of those who drafted it.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
In the Anglo-Arab Labyrinth: The McMahon-Husayn Correspondence and its ...
Limited preview - 2014
In the Anglo-Arab Labyrinth: The McMahon-Husayn Correspondence and Its ...
Limited preview - 2000
24 October Abdullah Allies Antonius Arab Bureau Arab caliphate Arab independence Arab movement Arab party Arab Revolt Arabia argument Baggallay Baggallay’s Baghdad Balfour declaration Basra boundaries Britain British government Cairo Cheetham cited Clayton committee Damascus districts of Damascus documents doubt draft Egypt fact Faruqi favour Faysal foreign office France French claims Grey Grey’s Hama Hama and Aleppo Hardinge Hedjaz Hijaz Hirtzel Hogarth message Homs Husayn Ibn Sa'ud India office interests interpretation Islam Jeddah Kedourie Khalifate Kitchener Kitchener’s letter of 24 Majesty’s Government Mark Sykes McMahon McMahon-Husayn correspondence McMahon’s despatch McMahon’s letter McMahon’s promises Mecca memorandum Mesopotamia Middle East minute Moslem negotiations Nicolson Ottoman empire Palestine Papers paragraph passage Picot pledge political proposed question regard secretary seen sent Sharif Sharif of Mecca Sharifian Sir H Storrs Storrs’s Sykes Sykes-Picot agreement Sykes’s Syria territory Toynbee Toynbee’s Turkish Turks vilayet Wilson Wingate Wingate’s wrote Zionist