The Real Clarence Thomas: Confirmation Veracity Meets Performance Reality
Justice Clarence Thomas is a controversial figure on the U.S. Supreme Court because of sexual harassment allegations raised against him during his 1991 Senate confirmation hearings. This study avoids unanswerable questions about Thomas's past by making a straightforward comparison of his confirmation testimony about his judicial philosophy against his subsequent judicial opinions. This comparison raises serious questions about Thomas's truthfulness during his sworn testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Because the legitimacy of the courts depends on the integrity of the judges, the authors argue for increased consideration of impeachment if significant evidence indicates that judicial nominees intentionally deceived the Senate and the public about their views on law and public policy.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
4 other sections not shown
affirmative action African Americans Anita Hill attorneys authority Bork Bush Chief Justice Christopher civil rights claims Clarence Thomas commerce clause concerning concurring confirmation hearings confirmation testimony Congress congressional conservative consistent constitutional interpretation constitutional rights controversial Court's decisions criminal justice critics death penalty dissenting effect Eighth Amendment elected equal protection clause evidence example exclusionary rule federal courts federal judges framers habeas corpus Hill's Ibid individuals interstate commerce issues Judge Clarence Thomas judicial decision judicial nominees judicial office judicial opinions judicial philosophy judicial restraint jurors jury Kennedy Law Review legislation Lemon test limited majority opinion ment nation Nomination of Judge officials original intent originalists political President prisoners punishment questions racial discrimination racial segregation Reagan regulate Rehnquist S.Ct Scalia social science Souter statements statute Supreme Court justice Thomas's judicial Thomas's opinion tion truth U.S. Constitution U.S. Supreme Court violations Voting Rights Act Warren Court York