Who Holds the Moral High Ground?

Front Cover
Societas Imprint Academic, 2008 - Philosophy - 122 pages
0 Reviews
Meta-ethical attempts to define concepts such as 'goodness', 'right and wrong', 'ought' and 'ought not', have proved largely futile, even over-ambitious. Morality, it is argued, should therefore be directed primarily at the reduction of suffering, principally because the latter is more easily recognisable and accords with an objective view and requirements of the human condition. All traditional and contemporary perspectives are without suitable criteria for evaluating moral dilemmas and without such guidance we face the potent threat of sliding to a destructive moral nihilism. This book presents a possible set of defining characteristics for the foundation of future moral evaluations and engagements, taking into consideration that the historically maligned female gender may be better disposed to ethical leadership.

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.


Moral OriginsThe spectre of Religion
Ancient Greeks and The Euthyphro Dilemma
Ethical DutiesKant

8 other sections not shown

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Bibliographic information