The language of rights is ubiquitous. It shapes the way we construct our debates over issues such as abortion, affirmative action and sexual freedom. This provocative new study challenges the very concept of rights, arguing that they jeopardize our liberty and undermine democratic debate. By re-conceptualizing our ideas about limited government, it suggests that we can limit the reasons or rationales on which the polity may act. Whereas we once used the language of rights to thwart democratic majorities, Bedi argues that we should now turn our attention to the democratic state's reason for acting. This will permit greater democratic flexibility and discretion while ensuring genuine liberty. Deftly employing political theory and constitutional law to state its case, the study radically rethinks the relationship between liberty and democracy, and will be essential reading for scholars and students of political and legal philosophy.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
abortion abortion debate account of limited Ackerman activity afﬁrmative action appeal argue argument articulating behavior beneﬁt Benhabib Bowers claim classiﬁcation contends Court debate decide decision deﬁne democracy democratic decision-making democratic deﬁcit democratic ﬂexibility democratic majority democratic polity demonstrable harm discrimination dissenting doctrines due process economic ensure equal protection exemption fails fetus ﬁnd ﬁrst gay sex Habermas hair color harm minimization heightened scrutiny Ibid individuals justiﬁcatory constraint kind Lawrence legislative purpose liberty and democracy limited government Lochner minimize demonstrable minimize harm morals legislation murder neutral non-consensual harm non-religion normative Oakeshott Paris Adult Theatre pass permitting prevent harm principle private sphere pro-lifer problematic prohibit race racial segregation rational review Rawls re-conceptualized reﬂexive regime regulation rejecting rights relevant religion religious repudiates requires right to privacy right to property same-sex marriage seek to minimize sexual simply sodomy laws speciﬁcally state’s statute substantive sufﬁcient suspect class theory of Justiﬁcation turn U.S. Constitution violate women