A Caring Jurisprudence: Listening to Patients at the Supreme Court
In deciding the abortion and physician assisted suicide cases, a majority of the Justices of the United States Supreme Court drew on medical knowledge to inform their opinions while dismissing the distinctively different knowledge offered by patients. Following the legal norms derived from the ethic of justice, the CourtOs deference toward the Ouniversal,O Oimpartial,O and OreasonedO knowledge of the medical profession and its disregard of the Oparticular,O Oinvolved,O and OemotionalO knowledge of patients seemed inevitable as well as justified. But was it? This book argues that it is both possible and proper to develop a jurisprudence capable of incorporating the knowledge of patients. Drawing on feminist scholarship, this book proposes a model for a Ocaring jurisprudenceO that integrates the ethic of justice and the ethic of care to ensure that patientsO knowledge is included in judicial decision making.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Abortion Cases The Merging of Medical and Legal Knowledge
The PhysicianAssisted Suicide Cases The Triumph of Medical Knowledge over Patients Knowledge
A Jurisprudence of Justice and Care Enabling the Court to Hear the Knowledge of Patients
Listening to Patients The Abortion and PhysicianAssisted Suicide Cases Revisited
Other editions - View all
abor abortion decision abortion law abortion right American amicus briefs applied argued assisted suicide Blackmun briefs ﬁled caring jurisprudence Casey challenge claim clinic concerns conﬂict context Court’s Court’s decisions Cruzan cultural death deﬁned doctors dying epistemologies ethic of care ethic of justice euthanasia experiences fact feminist fetal fetus ﬁnal ﬁnd ﬁrst ﬁve focus gender Gilligan’s Glucksberg and Quill Hippocratic oath ibid ical impartial inﬂuence integrate involved judicial decision knowl knowledge of patients Lady justice law’s legal abortion legal knowledge legal norms litigants loved medical issue medical knowledge medicine moral O’Connor offered opinion oral arguments pain palliative care particular party briefs perspective physicians Planned Parenthood pregnancy protection question relationship require respond restrictions right to die Roe’s role scientiﬁc social speciﬁc state’s statutes stories strict scrutiny suffering Supreme Court terminally ill patients tients tion treatment trimester unwanted pregnancy voice woman woman’s right women