Description of a Notation for the Logic of Relatives, Resulting from an Amplification of the Conceptions of Boole's Calculus of Logic |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Description of a Notation for the Logic of Relatives, Resulting from an ... Charles Sanders Peirce No preview available - 2018 |
Description of a Notation for the Logic of Relatives, Resulting from an ... Charles Sanders Peirce No preview available - 2018 |
Description of a Notation for the Logic of Relatives: Resulting from an ... Charles Sanders Peirce No preview available - 2017 |
Common terms and phrases
absolute terms addition algebra appears becomes betrayer binomial Boole Boole's character colleagues comma commutative conception conjugative term consider contains converse correlate corresponding definition denote determinate differential division elementary relatives enemy equal equations everything example exclusive exists express fact former formula four Frenchman function geometry given giver gives Hence hold horse identical individual individual terms infinite infinitesimal interpretation inverse involution involve latter letters logic of relatives logical logical division lover means multiplication negative non-X notation objects operation ordinary pairs particular person powers present principle properties proposition pupils quaternion reason reference regarded relation relative term scalar sense servant signifies simple space stands substituted subtraction suppose teachers theorem things third true universe usual vanish whole woman women write zero
Popular passages
Page 20 - The absolute individual can not only not be realized in sense or thought, but can not exist, properly speaking. For whatever lasts for any time, however short, is capable of logical division, because in that time it will undergo some change in its relations. But what does not exist for any time, however short, does not exist at all. All, therefore, that we perceive or think, or that exists, is general.
Page 20 - For whatever lasts for any time, however short, is capable of logical division, because in that time it will undergo some change in its relations. But what does not exist for any time, however short, does not exist at all. All, therefore, that we perceive or think, or that exists, is general. So far there is truth in the doctrine of scholastic realism. But all that exists is infinitely determinate, and the infinitely determinate is the absolutely individual. This seems paradoxical, but the contradiction...
Page 32 - It is very likely that this is true of all algebras whatever. The algebra of (156), which is of such a fundamental character in reference to pure algebra and our logical notation, has been shown by Professor [Benjamin] Peirce to be the algebra of Hamilton's quaternions.
Page 19 - In thought, an absolutely determinate term cannot be realized, because, not being given by sense, such a concept would have to be formed by synthesis, and there would be no end to the synthesis because there is no limit to the number of possible predicates. A logical atom, then, like a point in space, would involve for its precise determination an endless process. We can only say, in a general way, that a term, however determinate, may be made more determinate still, but not that it can be made absolutely...
Page 46 - Application of the Algebraic Signs to Logic," together with those relating to backward involution, and the principles expressed by equations (95), (96), (122), (142), (156), (25), (26), (14), (15), (169), (170). But these axioms are mere substitutes for definitions of the universal logical relations, and so far as these can be defined, all axioms may be dispensed with. The fundamental principles of formal logic are not properly axioms, but definitions and divisions ; and the only facts which it contains...