A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine |
Contents
Introduction | 1 |
whats wrong with peer | 23 |
whats wrong with peer | 39 |
Copyright | |
9 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abstracts acceptance rate adverse drug reactions American anonymous applications articles published articles submitted asked aspects assessment assessors authors Behavioural and Brain better bias biomedical blind reviewing Brain Sciences British Medical Journal cent Checklist citation analysis citation rates cited consensus criteria critical decision discipline discussed editorial board editorial peer review editors and referees England Journal ensure evaluation example expert Finally findings Firstly funding given groups guidelines hanging committee high impact factor important Ingelfinger institutions invisible colleges John Darsee Journal de Sçavans Journal of Medicine judgments kind permission Lancet major manuscript Matthew effect medical journals methods minor universities Nevertheless opinions original articles outcome pathological science Peters Peters and Ceci plagiarism proposals published elsewhere questions readers recommendations referee's report References begin rejected articles rejection rates research grants revised sample schistosomiasis sciences journals scientific community scientists statistical suggested Table Yes Unclear