Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life
"People of good will wish to see science and religion at peace. . . . I do not see how science and religion could be unified, or even synthesized, under any common scheme of explanation or analysis; but I also do not understand why the two enterprises should experience any conflict." So states internationally renowned evolutionist and bestselling author Stephen Jay Gould in the simple yet profound thesis of his brilliant new book.
Writing with bracing intelligence and elegant clarity, Gould sheds new light on a dilemma that has plagued thinking people since the Renaissance. Instead of choosing between science and religion, Gould asks, why not opt for a golden mean that accords dignity and distinction to each realm?
At the heart of Gould's penetrating argument is a lucid, contemporary principle he calls NOMA (for nonoverlapping magisteria)--a "blessedly simple and entirely conventional resolution" that allows science and religion to coexist peacefully in a position of respectful noninterference. Science defines the natural world; religion, our moral world, in recognition of their separate spheres of influence.
In elaborating and exploring this thought-provoking concept, Gould delves into the history of science, sketching affecting portraits of scientists and moral leaders wrestling with matters of faith and reason. Stories of seminal figures such as Galileo, Darwin, and Thomas Henry Huxley make vivid his argument that individuals and cultures must cultivate both a life of the spirit and a life of rational inquiry in order to experience the fullness of being human.
In his bestselling books Wonderful Life, The Mismeasure of Man, and Questioning the Millennium, Gould has written on the abundance of marvels in human history and the natural world. In Rocks of Ages, Gould's passionate humanism, ethical discernment, and erudition are fused to create a dazzling gem of contemporary cultural philosophy. As the world's preeminent Darwinian theorist writes, "I believe, with all my heart, in a respectful, even loving concordat between . . . science and religion."
From the Hardcover edition.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
A Tale of Two Thomases
The Fate of Two Fathers
2THE PROBLEM RESOLVED IN PRINCIPLE
NOMA Defined and Defended
Coda and Segue
3HISTORICAL REASONS FOR CONFLICT
An Example of the Fallacy of Warfare Between Science and Religion
The Struggle Against Modern Creationism
4PSYCHOLOGICAL REASONS FOR CONFLICT
Can Nature Nurture Our Hopes?
Natures Cold Bath and Darwins Defense of NOMA
The Two False Paths of Irenics
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
A Note on The Library of Contemporary Thought
The Contingent Basis for Intensity
Other editions - View all
accept American argued argument Asa Gray battle believe Bryan Burnet Catholic chapter Christian Church claim Columbus complex concept conflict Cosmas Indicopleustes creation creation science creationists Darrow Darwin death defend distinct divine doctrine dogmatic domain Draper entirely ethical evolutionary example exist facts of nature false famous flat earth flat-earth myth fundamentalist Galileo Genesis God’s H. L. Mencken human Huxley impose inquiry intellectual issue Jesus life’s lives logic magisterium of religion magisterium of science major Mark Tansey meaning metaphor model of warfare modern moral natural law natural world nature’s factuality never Newton non-overlapping non-overlapping magisteria papal particular Pius political Pope proper public schools questions religious represent science and religion scientific scientists Scopes trial species struggle syncretism syncretist T. H. Huxley teacher theological theory things bright Thomas Thomas Burnet traditional ultimate universe valid violation of NOMA warfare between science words wrote young-earth creationism