Cartography: The Ideal and Its History

Front Cover
University of Chicago Press, Apr 12, 2019 - Technology & Engineering - 323 pages
Over the past four decades, the volumes published in the landmark History of Cartography series have both chronicled and encouraged scholarship about maps and mapping practices across time and space. As the current director of the project that has produced these volumes, Matthew H. Edney has a unique vantage point for understanding what “cartography” has come to mean and include.

In this book Edney disavows the term cartography, rejecting the notion that maps represent an undifferentiated category of objects for study. Rather than treating maps as a single, unified group, he argues, scholars need to take a processual approach that examines specific types of maps—sea charts versus thematic maps, for example—in the context of the unique circumstances of their production, circulation, and consumption. To illuminate this bold argument, Edney chronicles precisely how the ideal of cartography that has developed in the West since 1800 has gone astray. By exposing the flaws in this ideal, his book challenges everyone who studies maps and mapping practices to reexamine their approach to the topic. The study of cartography will never be the same.
 

Contents

1 Introducing the Ideal of Cartography
1
2 Seeing and Seeing Past the Ideal
9
3 Cartographys Idealized Preconceptions
50
4 The Ideal of Cartography Emerges
103
5 Map Scale and Cartographys Idealized Geometry
166
6 Not Cartography But Mapping
228
Bibliography
239
Index
281
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2019)

Matthew H. Edney is the Osher Professor in the History of Cartography at the University of Southern Maine. He directs the History of Cartography Project at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, for which he has coedited Volume 4, Cartography in the European Enlightenment. He is a contributor to many books and author of Mapping anEmpire: The Geographical Construction of British India, 1765–1843, also published by the University of Chicago Press.

Bibliographic information