Dry Grain Farming Families: Hausalund (Nigeria) and Karnataka (India) Compared

Front Cover
Cambridge University Press, Oct 7, 1982 - Business & Economics - 322 pages
Anthropologists and economists have made persistent efforts to identify economic features of rural tropical economies in the simplest possible terms, in order to enhance their universality. This has resulted in the creation of doctrine on such matters as the causes of rural economic inequality and abysmal poverty. The doctrine is far too generalised to have any practical utility; it is ahistorical; and it usually involves the false belief that all cultivators in a community have similar economic responses. So firm is this orthodoxy that under-development studies have become deadlocked - to the point that our ignorance is constantly on the increase. The book represents a radical assault on prevailing orthodoxy, breaking the deadlock by insisting that we properly categorise the main types of agrarian system in the tropical world. Moreover, it practically demonstrates how to identify these important categories, and draw useful generalised conclusions about it, on the basis of detailed fieldwork in parts of northern Nigeria and south India.
 

Contents

IX
21
XI
40
XII
41
XIV
44
XV
46
XVI
47
XVIII
49
XIX
73
XLIII
168
XLIV
176
XLV
179
XLVI
181
XLVII
192
XLVIII
193
XLIX
195
L
203

XX
75
XXI
76
XXII
81
XXIII
87
XXV
88
XXVI
91
XXVII
103
XXVIII
104
XXIX
105
XXX
106
XXXI
120
XXXII
132
XXXIII
135
XXXIV
136
XXXV
139
XXXVI
141
XXXVII
160
XXXVIII
162
XXXIX
164
XLI
165
XLII
166
LI
205
LII
206
LIII
208
LIV
221
LV
223
LVI
232
LVII
234
LVIII
235
LX
237
LXI
238
LXII
240
LXIII
253
LXIV
254
LXV
261
LXVI
264
LXVII
275
LXVIII
276
LXIX
284
LXX
297
LXXI
307
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 15 - ... of large bodies of the human race, placed under different circumstances, can be learnt only by an appeal to experience. He must, indeed, be a shallow reasoner, who by mere efforts of consciousness, by consulting his own views, feelings and motives, and the narrow sphere of his personal observation, and reasoning a priori, from them expects that he shall be able to anticipate the conduct, progress and fortunes of large bodies of men, differing from himself in moral or physical temperament, and...
Page 14 - We must get comprehensive views of facts, that we may arrive at principles that are truly comprehensive. If we take a different method, if we snatch at general principles, and content ourselves with confined observations, two things will happen to us. First, what we...
Page 14 - If we wish to make ourselves acquainted with the economy and arrangements by which the different nations of the earth produce and distribute their revenues, I really know but of one way to attain our object, and that is, to look and see. We must get comprehensive views of facts, that we may arrive at principles which are truly comprehensive.
Page 16 - With the master, what is new and significant develops vigorously amid the 'manure' of contradictions out of the contradictory phenomena. The underlying contradictions themselves testify to the richness of the living foundation from which the theory itself developed. It is different with the disciple. His raw material is no longer reality, but the new theoretical form in which the master had sublimated it. It...
Page 2 - Ricardo was unhistorical in his approach, and that the main distinction between Marx and Ricardo is that Marx saw capitalism as a mere passing phase in the history of human society, whereas Ricardo did not.
Page 13 - ... be universally true, which, at every step of our further progress, we shall be obliged to confess are frequently false : and, secondly, we shall miss a great mass of useful knowledge, which those who advance to principles by a comprehensive examination of facts, necessarily meet with on their road. If we want to understand the subjects of wages or rent for instance, and take the trouble to observe how the various nations of the earth employ and pay their laborers or distribute to the landowners...
Page 15 - ... the most comprehensive views of society. The principles which determine the position and progress, and govern the conduct, of large bodies of the human race, placed under different circumstances, can be learnt only by an appeal to experience. He must, indeed, be a shallow reasoner, who by mere efforts of consciousness, by consulting his own views, feelings and motives, and the narrow sphere of his personal observation, and reasoning a priori, from them expects that he shall be able to anticipate...
Page 19 - Agricultural Labourer : A person who works in another person's land for wages in money, kind or share should be regarded as an agricultural labourer. He has no risk in the cultivation but he merely works in another person's land for wages. The labourer could have no right of lease or contract on land on which he works.
Page 18 - C' should be used. Definition of Cultivator: — For purposes of the Census a person is working as Cultivator if he or she is engaged in cultivation by oneself or by supervision or direction in one's capacity as the owner or lessee of land held from...

Bibliographic information