We commonly think of marriage as a private matter between two people, a personal expression of love and commitment. In this pioneering history, Nancy F. Cott demonstrates that marriage is and always has been a public institution. From the founding of the United States to the present day, imperatives about the necessity of marriage and its proper form have been deeply embedded in national policy, law, and political rhetoric. Legislators and judges have envisioned and enforced their preferred model of consensual, lifelong monogamy--a model derived from Christian tenets and the English common law that posits the husband as provider and the wife as dependent. In early confrontations with Native Americans, emancipated slaves, Mormon polygamists, and immigrant spouses, through the invention of the New Deal, federal income tax, and welfare programs, the federal government consistently influenced the shape of marriages. And even the immense social and legal changes of the last third of the twentieth century have not unraveled official reliance on marriage as a pillar of the state. By excluding some kinds of marriages and encouraging others, marital policies have helped to sculpt the nation's citizenry, as well as its moral and social standards, and have directly affected national understandings of gender roles and racial difference. Public Vows is a panoramic view of marriage's political history, revealing the national government's profound role in our most private of choices. No one who reads this book will think of marriage in the same way again.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
African American amendment authority Basch behavior beneﬁts bigamy Cambridge century Chinese Christian citizens citizenship civil rights cohabitation Comstock law Congress consent contract couple’s couples coverture culture deﬁned deﬁnition divorce domestic economic Emancipation entry 9 ex-slaves federal ﬁgures ﬁle ﬁrst free love Freedmen’s Freedmen’s Bureau freedom Gender History household husband and wife Immigration Indian inﬂuence informal marriage institution Japanese labor legal marriage legislation legislatures male man’s marital unity married women’s property men’s monogamy moral Mormon mothers native Americans North Carolina obligations ofﬁce ofﬁcials partner picture brides plural marriage political polygamy prostitutes protection proxy marriage quotation quoted race racial reﬂected reformers relations Republican riage same-sex same-sex marriage sexual slaveholding slavery slaves social South southern state’s status tion U.S. Supreme Court Union United Utah wife’s wives woman women women’s rights York
Page 12 - Such duty as the subject owes the prince, Even such a woman oweth to her husband; And when she is froward, peevish, sullen, sour, And not obedient to his honest will, What is she but a foul contending rebel And graceless traitor to her loving lord?
Page 15 - the word rights is an offensive expression"; "that the king, his ministry, and parliament, will not endure to hear Americans talk of their rights"; "that Britain is the mother and we the children, that a filial duty and submission is due from us to her," and that "we ought to doubt our own judgment and presume that she is right, even when she seems to us to shake the foundations of government...