The Question of German Guilt
Shortly after the Nazi government fell, a philosophy professor at Heidelberg University lectured on a subject that burned the consciousness and conscience of thinking Germans. Are the German people guilty?These lectures by Karl Jaspers, an outstanding European philosopher, attracted wide attention among German intellectuals and students; they seemed to offer a path to sanity and morality in a disordered world. Jaspers, a life-long liberal, attempted in this book to discuss rationally a problem that had thus far evoked only heat and fury. Neither an evasive apology nor a wholesome condemnation, his book distinguished between types of guilt and degrees of responsibility. He listed four categories of guilt: criminal guilt (the commitment of overt acts), political guilt (the degree of political acquiescence in the Nazi regime), moral guilt (a matter of private judgment among one's friends), and metaphysical guilt (a universally shared responsibility of those who chose to remain alive rather than die in protest against Nazi atrocities). Karl Jaspers (1883-1969) took his degree in medicine but soon became interested in psychiatry. He is the author of a standard work of psychopathology, as well as special studies on Strindberg, Van Gogh and Nietsche. After World War I he became Professor of Philosophy at Heidelberg, where he achieved fame as a brilliant teacher and an early exponent of existentialism. He was among the first to acquaint German readers with the works of Kierkegaard. Jaspers had to resign from his post in 1935. From the total isolation into which the Hitler regime forced him, Jaspers returned in 1945 to a position of central intellectual leadership of the younger liberal elements of Germany. In his first lecture in 1945, he forcefully reminded his audience of the fate of the German Jews. Jaspers's unblemished record as an anti-Nazi, as well as his sentient mind, have made him a rallying point center for those of his compatriots who wish to reconstruct a free and democratic Germany.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Ladies and Gentlemen
Scheme of Distinctions
The German Questions
Differentiation of German Guilt
Other editions - View all
accuse actions acts aspers’s become charges co-responsible collective guilt committed common concentration camps confession conscience consequences course crimes decision deﬁance deﬁned destruction diﬁerence disaster discussion Dwight Macdonald evade everything evil existentialists fact false fate feel ﬁnally ﬁnd ﬁrst force freedom German guilt guilt consciousness guilt question guiltless happen hear Hitler human existence idea impotence individual inner Jaspers Jews judge judgment KARL JASPERS live mankind means ment metaphysical guilt military moral and metaphysical moral guilt nation National-Socialism National-Socialist Nazi neutral countries Nuremberg Nuremberg trial one’s original sin ourselves outraged philosophical political guilt political liability political liberty possible punishment puriﬁcation reality reﬂect regime remain responsibility sacriﬁce seek self-analysis sense situation solidarity soul speciﬁc spirit suffering suﬁering talk terror things thought tion Treaty of Versailles trial true truth University University of Heidelberg vanquished victors whole world opinion