La mise en oeuvre du Corpus juris dans les États membres: dispositions pénales pour la protection des finances de l'Europe, Volume 3
Intersentia, 2000 - Commercial crimes - 503 pages
The establishment of an area of freedom, security and justice is one of the key objectives of the Treaty of Amsterdam. Measures to harmonize criminal law as well as measures in the field of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters are an integral part of the strategy by which to attain this objective. On the basis of the conclusions of the European Council meeting at Tampere (1999), it is obvious that measures are needed so as to guarantee the real mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters, including the pre-trial decisions, and to guarantee the free circulation of criminal evidence. The original Corpus Juris study (1997) had elaborated a number of guiding principles in relation to the protection of the financial interests of the European Union within the framework of the European Judicial Space, including the European Public Prosecutor. This follow-up to the Corpus Juris study aims to analyse the feasibility of the Corpus Juris in relation to the legislation of the Member States and also to analyse the horizontal and vertical cooperation in the Member States. The publication of the follow-up study consists of four volumes. Volume I includes a final synthesis, with a new version of the Corpus Juris (Corpus Juris 2000), and syntheses on the feasibility of the Corpus Juris (draft of 1997) in relation to the legislation of the Member States. Volumes II and III include the 15 national reports concerning the 35 articles of the Corpus Juris (1997 draft). Volume IV relates only to questions concerning horizontal and vertical co-operation. The study was carried out in 1998-1999 upon the request of the European Parliament and the Anti-Fraud Office, OLAF, by researchers from the Association of European Lawyers for the Protection of the Financial Interests of the European Union.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Austria Prof F Höpfel
Netherlands Prof J VervaeleDr A Klip
Portugal M T Alves Martins
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accused acte appeal applicable application Article authority base cadre charge civile code d'instruction criminelle code pénal commission Community compatibilité compétence concerne considération Corpus juris corruption Cour court crime criminal decision defendant délit détermination different direct disposition doit Dutch effet England English espagnol European européen evidence fiscal fonction fonctionnaire form fraud general have important information infractions investigation judge judiciaire juge juridiction juridique Justice l'article l'infraction légal legislation liability lieu limite luxembourgeois made make matière means mesure ministère public national Northern Ireland objection offence office official order organisation paragraphe participation peine Penal person police présent preuve prévue principe problems procédure proceedings prosecution prosecutor provision publique question regards règles relation relevant require respect responsabilité right rules sanction Scotland section semble sentence serait serious seulement State suiv system take terms there toutefois trial tribunal type under would years