Intertextuality in Ugarit and Israel

Front Cover
Johannes Cornelis De Moor, Society for Old Testament Study
BRILL, 1998 - Religion - 213 pages
0 Reviews
In modern literary studies intertextuality is at the centre of interest. Although the relationship between texts has always been an important aspect of Old Testament studies, especially in literary criticism, the scale of comparison has broadened, including for example the interrelationships between the First, Second and Third Isaiah, or the whole Book of the Twelve. These relatively new approaches raise a number of methodical questions which were addressed at the Tenth Joint Meeting of the British Society for Old Testament Study and the Dutch 'Oudtestamentisch Werkgezelschap', held at Oxford, 22nd to 25th July 1997. Did the ancient authors have a well-defined concept of a book? How did they relate to the literary work of their predecessors and contemporaries? Can we trace the theological motifs behind their use of other literary compositions? What does an ancient version reveal about the way it interpreted its source text? One of the problems confronting biblical scholars in this kind of research is the lack of controllable models. Therefore it is useful to study the work of the Ugaritic chief priest Ilimilku whose three major literary compositions provide us with a unique possibility to monitor intertextual relationships in the work of one and the same ancient author. Ugaritic and other ancient Near Eastern parallels help us to understand how the Priestly writer re-interpreted the Yahwistic account of the creation of mankind. Apparently intertextuality in Israel is a phenomenon which cannot properly be understood without taking other literature from the ancient world into account.

What people are saying - Write a review

We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.


FlSHBANE The Hebrew Bible and Exegetical Tradition
H W M VAN GROL Exegesis of the Exile Exegesis of Scripture?
J JOOSTEN Exegesis in the Septuagint Version of Hosea
Gen 12627 as
J REIMER Political Prophets? Political Exegesis and Prophetic
K A D SMELIK The Representation of King Ahaz in 2 Kings 16
The Result of PostExilic
Index of Tablets from Ugarit

Common terms and phrases

About the author (1998)

Johannes C. de Moor, Ph.D. (1971) Free University, Amsterdam, is professor of Semitic languages at Kampen, The Netherlands. He is editor of several international series, among them Oudtestamentische Studien.