Ballot Battles: The History of Disputed Elections in the United States

Front Cover
Oxford University Press, 2016 - History - 479 pages
The 2000 presidential race resulted in the highest-profile ballot battle in over a century. But it is far from the only American election determined by a handful of votes and marred by claims of fraud. Since the founding of the nation, violence frequently erupted as the votes were being counted, and more than a few elections produced manifestly unfair results. Despite America's claim to be the world's greatest democracy, its adherence to the basic tenets of democratic elections-the ability to count ballots accurately and fairly even when the stakes are high-has always been shaky. A rigged gubernatorial election in New York in 1792 nearly ended in calls for another revolution, and an 1899 gubernatorial race even resulted in an assassination. Though acts of violence have decreased in frequency over the past century, fairness and accuracy in ballot counting nonetheless remains a basic problem in American political life.

In Ballot Battles, Edward Foley presents a sweeping history of election controversies in the United States, tracing how their evolution generated legal precedents that ultimately transformed how we determine who wins and who loses. While weaving a narrative spanning over two centuries, Foley repeatedly returns to an originating event: because the Founding Fathers despised parties and never envisioned the emergence of a party system, they wrote a constitution that did not provide clear solutions for high-stakes and highly-contested elections in which two parties could pool resources against one another. Moreover, in the American political system that actually developed, politicians are beholden to the parties which they represent - and elected officials have typically had an outsized say in determining the outcomes of extremely close elections that involve recounts. This underlying structural problem, more than anything else, explains why intense ballot battles that leave one side feeling aggrieved will continue to occur for the foreseeable future.

American democracy has improved dramatically over the last two centuries. But the same cannot be said for the ways in which we determine who wins the very close races. From the founding until today, there has been little progress toward fixing the problem. Indeed, supporters of John Jay in 1792 and opponents of Lyndon Johnson in the 1948 Texas Senate race would find it easy to commiserate with Al Gore after the 2000 election. Ballot Battles is not only the first full chronicle of contested elections in the US. It also provides a powerful explanation of why the American election system has been-and remains-so ineffective at deciding the tightest races in a way that all sides will agree is fair.

 

What people are saying - Write a review

Ballot Battles: The History of Disputed Elections in the United States

User Review  - Publishers Weekly

Foley, professor of law at Ohio State University, exhaustively documents how ballots were counted and the results adjudicated in very close municipal, statewide, and national elections from the 18th ... Read full review

Contents

 The Missing Institution of Impartiality
1
 Understanding the Past for the Sake of the Future
10
1 Uncertain VoteCounting in the Founding Era
25
2 The Novelty of Chief Executive Elections
48
3 The Entrenchment of TwoParty Competition
75
4 Counting Votes at Times of Crisis
98
 To the Edge of the Constitutional Cliff
117
 An Era of Hypercompetitive Elections
150
 The Rise of Democratic Expectations
233
 Reemergence of Intensified Partisanship
257
 Avoiding a Return to the Constitutional Brink
279
 Reinvigorated Demand for Electoral Fairness
306
 The Enduring Quest for a Fair Count
337
 Data on Overtime Elections
363
Notes
377
Index
467

 Missed Opportunities at a Time of Reform
178
 A Tarnished Ideal
204

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2016)


Edward B. Foley is the Charles W. Ebersold and Florence Whitcomb Ebersold Chair in Law and Director of Election Law at The Ohio State University College of Law.

Bibliographic information