King James Onlyism: A New Sect"The doctrine that the King James Version is the only authoritative Bible for English-speaking people has become known as King James Onlyism, taking on the characteristics of a sect. Using evidence from Scripture, history, theology, textual criticism, and ancient and modern Bible versions, this book demonstrates that this doctrine is of recent vintage, being unknown before the mid-twentieth century. It also demonstrates that conservative modern translations of the Bible equally support the cardinal doctrines of Scripture"--Amazon.com. |
What people are saying - Write a review
Dr. Price has done the church a great service. This book is informative, accurate, and gracious--the best book on the topic that I have found. I highly recommend it!
The other reviewers did not even take the time to purchase and read the book! Dr. Price has presented a powerful and scholarly volume that deals with the mistaken idea that a translation is in the same stream of the original language scriptures. His evidence and spirit deal with a very emotionally driven issue for so many people. This book is not a hit piece, nor is it a pack of thickly worded distortions meant to simple confuse. Its purpose is to provide accurate and honest information.
Contents
Chapter page | 21 |
Figure Page | 25 |
Tyndale Was the First to Translate from Hebrew and Greek | 31 |
Tyndales Translation Was Revised Seven Times | 43 |
Chapter page | 61 |
The King James Version Was Revised Several Times | 91 |
Current Editions of the King James Version Differ | 105 |
The Biblical Text Was Preserved through Ancient Bibles | 125 |
Chapter page | 371 |
Textual Uncertainty Is Insignificant | 395 |
Changes in the AV Since 1611 | 425 |
Catalogue of Variants in Current Editions of the AV | 449 |
Examples of Late Secondary Byzantine Readings | 457 |
The Overall Witness of the Ancient Versions Is Inadequate | 481 |
The Citations of the Church Fathers Are Insufficient | 488 |
The Combined Witness of Versions and Fathers Is Inadequate | 495 |
The Biblical Text Was Preserved in Ancient Translations | 153 |
Chapter page | 170 |
Some Recognize the Alexandrian Text as the Preserved Text | 181 |
Some Recognize the Majority Text as the Preserved Text | 219 |
Figure Page | 225 |
Some Recognize the Textus Receptus as the Preserved Text | 251 |
Textual Emendations Were Made in the King James Version | 277 |
Chapter page | 280 |
Modern English Versions Are Evaluated | 295 |
Modern Versions Support Orthodox Doctrine | 315 |
The Model Is Unrealistic | 501 |
The Theory Is Inadequate | 509 |
The Majority Theory Has Limitations | 522 |
and the Byzantine Text | 549 |
Textual Emendations in the Authorized Version | 561 |
and the RP Byzantine Text | 593 |
Glossary of Terms | 625 |
633 | |
645 | |