Foundations of Forensic Mental Health Assessment
Oxford University Press, Aug 6, 2008 - Psychology - 192 pages
Forensic mental health assessment (FMHA) has grown into a specialization informed by research and professional guidelines. This series presents up-to-date information on the most important and frequently conducted forms of FMHA. The 19 topical volumes address best approaches to practice for particular types of evaluation in the criminal, civil, and juvenile/family areas. Each volume contains a thorough discussion of the relevant legal and psychological concepts, followed by a step-by-step description of the assessment process from preparing for the evaluation to writing the report and testifying in court. Volumes include the following helpful features: - Boxes that zero in on important information for use in evaluations - Tips for best practice and cautions against common pitfalls - Highlighting of relevant case law and statutes - Separate list of assessment tools for easy reference - Helpful glossary of key terms for the particular topic. In making recommendations for best practice, authors consider empirical support, legal relevance, and consistency with ethical and professional standards. These volumes offer invaluable guidance for anyone involved in conducting or using forensic evaluations. This first volume in the series serves an introduction to the field of FMHA, and provides an overview of the foundational concepts applied in the other 19 volumes.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Chapter 3 Relevant Sources of Authority for Developing BestPractice Standards
Chapter 4 Principles of Forensic Mental Health Assessment
Chapter 5 Toward Best Practices in Forensic Mental Health Assessment
Academy of Psychiatry American Academy American Psychological Association American Psychology-Law Society applicable areas attorney behavior best practice best-practice standard capacities chapter child custody clinical competence to stand concepts conducting FMHA considered established context criminal cross-examination defendant DeMatteo described discussed domains empirical Ethics Code Ethics Guidelines examination expert testimony expertise focus forensic assessment instruments forensic clinician forensic evaluations forensic issues forensic mental health forensic psychiatry forensic psychology functional abilities Goldstein Grisso Gutheil Heilbrun identify important individual’s insanity defense interviews involved jurisdictions juvenile court knowledge limits litigation maxims Melton ment mental health assessment mental health experts mental health professionals Miranda rights offer one’s opinions principle was considered psychological tests referral relevant reliability response style role scientific Specialty Guidelines specific stand trial standards of practice testify third party information tion topics U.S. Supreme Court ultimate legal question validity violence risk