The 1991 Lead/copper Drinking Water Rule and the 1995 Decision Not to Revise the Arsenic Drinking Water Rule: Two Case Studies in EPA's Use of Science |
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Common terms and phrases
According agency agency's Air Quality analysis arsenic drinking water arsenic in drinking ASARCO Assistant Administrator blood lead carcinogen Clean Air Act concluded Criteria Document decision detoxification dose dose-response drinking water consumption drinking water official drinking water program drinking water rule drinking water standard Drinking Water Subcommittee Environmental Health EPA drinking water EPA's EPA/RAF epidemiological studies Ernhart evidence former EPA official health effects inorganic arsenic internal cancers issues Ken Brown lead exposure lead in drinking lead levels Lead Mafia linear MCLG methylation Mushak and Crocetti NAAQS Needleman Office of Water ORD scientist Perciasepe Peter Preuss pharmacokinetics proposed pursue additional research reference dose regulated Research Triangle Park respondents revise risk assessment rulemaking SAB Drinking Safe Drinking Water scientific information scientific misconduct SEGH skin cancer skin cancer risk staff Superfund Taiwan Taiwan study Taiwanese threshold water lead
Bibliographic information
| Title | The 1991 Lead/copper Drinking Water Rule and the 1995 Decision Not to Revise the Arsenic Drinking Water Rule: Two Case Studies in EPA's Use of Science Volume 97, Issue 5 of Discussion paper |
| Author | Mark R. Powell |
| Contributor | Resources for the Future |
| Publisher | Resources for the Future, 1997 |
| Original from | Pennsylvania State University |
| Digitized | Aug 18, 2010 |
| Length | 73 pages |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |