The Body and the State: Habeas Corpus and American Jurisprudence
The writ of habeas corpus is the principal means by which state prisoners, many on death row, attack the constitutionality of their conviction in federal courts. In The Body and the State, Cary Federman contends that habeas corpus is more than just a get-out-of-jail-free card—it gives death row inmates a constitutional means of overturning a jury’s mistaken determination of guilt. Tracing the history of the writ since 1789, Federman examines its influence on federal-state relations and argues that habeas corpus petitions turn legal language upside down, threatening the states’ sovereign judgment to convict and execute criminals as well as upsetting the discourse, created by the Supreme Court, that the federal-state relationship ought not be disturbed by convicted criminals making habeas corpus appeals. He pays particular attention to the changes in the discourse over federalism and capital punishment that have restricted the writ’s application over time.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Habeas Corpus in the New American State 17891915
Bodily Inventions The Habeas Petitioner and the Corporation 1886
Habeas Corpus as Counternarrative The Rise of Due Process 19231953
Confessions and the Narratives of Justice 19631979
Future Dangerousness and Habeas Corpus 19822002
Other editions - View all
Body and the State, The: Habeas Corpus and American Jurisprudence
Limited preview - 2012
37th Congress AEDPA American appeal application arrest attack Bill of Rights body Brennan Brown Burger Court capital punishment cause and prejudice certiorari Chicago Civil claims collateral concerns confession Congress congressional corporate corporate personhood counsel Court's habeas crime criminal justice death penalty decision defendant defendant's deference denied detention discourse dissent Eisentrager enemy combatants eral Ex parte Quirin Ex parte Royall executive federal courts federal habeas corpus federal-state comity Felix Frankfurter Fourteenth Amendment Frank Frankfurter future dangerousness guilt habeas cor habeas petitioners habeas petitions Hamdi individual institutional judgment judicial Judiciary jurisdiction standard jurisprudence jury language Law Review Leo Frank liberty military murder nineteenth century Noia O'Connor opinion Penry person petitioner's police political Powell prisoners procedural protection punishment question Quirin Ramdass Rehnquist Court relief restrict retroactively rule Scalia sentence state's Supreme Court Teague tion trial United University Press violation Warren Court writ of habeas writ's wrote York