C. S. Lewis's Dangerous Idea: In Defense of the Argument from Reason
Who ought to hold claim to the more dangerous idea--Charles Darwin or C. S. Lewis? Daniel Dennett argued for Darwin in Darwin's Dangerous Idea (Touchstone Books, 1996). In this book Victor Reppert champions C. S. Lewis. Darwinists attempt to use science to show that our world and its inhabitants can be fully explained as the product of a mindless, purposeless system of physics and chemistry. But Lewis claimed in his argument from reason that if such materialism or naturalism were true then scientific reasoning itself could not be trusted. Victor Reppert believes that Lewis's arguments have been too often dismissed. In C. S. Lewis's Dangerous Idea Reppert offers careful, able development of Lewis's thought and demonstrates that the basic thrust of Lewis's argument from reason can bear up under the weight of the most serious philosophical attacks. Charging dismissive critics, Christian and not, with ad hominem arguments, Reppert also revisits the debate and subsequent interaction between Lewis and the philosopher Elizabeth Anscombe. And addressing those who might be afflicted with philosophical snobbery, Reppert demonstrates that Lewis's powerful philosophical instincts perhaps ought to place him among those other thinkers who, by contemporary standards, were also amateurs: Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Aquinas, Descartes, Spinoza, Locke and Hume. But even more than this, Reppert's work exemplifies the truth that the greatness of Lewis's mind is best measured, not by his ability to do our thinking for us, but by his capacity to provide sound direction for taking our own thought further up and further in.
What people are saying - Write a review
Review: C.S. Lewis's Dangerous Idea: In Defense of the Argument from ReasonUser Review - Jason Pratt - Christianbook.com
Good introduction and survey of modern theistic "Arguments from Reason"; deep enough for a college course textbook, while also brief enough that it could in fact be taught over a semester. One of the ... Read full review
Other editions - View all
A. J. Ayer accept Alvin Plantinga analysis anomalous monism argu argument from reason atheist basic explanations brain C. S. Lewis chapter Christian Churchland claims committed conclusion Consider cosmic sadist created Daniel Dennett defend Dennett Elizabeth Anscombe epistemic event evolution explanatory dualism fact faculties false fideism Grief Observed gument human irrational causes Jaegwon Kim John Beversluis Keith Parsons laws of logic laws of physics Lewis's apologetics Lewis's argument lief logical laws maintains materialism is true materialist matter mechanistic ment mental causation Metaphysics mind Miracles naturalism is true naturalistic necessary truths objects Ockhamism person philoso philosophical Philosophy of Mind phys physicalist position possible worlds problem processes question rational inference refute rejected Russell scientific enterprise seems sense simply skeptical someone soul strong rationalism supernatural supervenience suppose survival theism theistic things thought tion type of explanation University Press valid virtue William Hasker worldview