Why poor people stay poor: urban bias in world development
Argues that the greatest division in the world today is the economic gap between urban and rural areas in the developing countries and sets forth approaches to improving the conditions of the world's most impoverished peoples
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The coexistence of poverty and development
What is urban bias and is it to blame?
19 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
agri agriculture allocation argument autarky average Balassa Bangladesh benefits big farmers c-criterion capacity capitalist cash cent chapter Colombia costs Delhi disparity DRAC Economic Development effect efficiency elite equity especially exports extra capital extra income extra output Fanon farm investment farm output farm sector fertilisers foreign Ghana green revolution growth hence hereafter cited higher IBRD impact imports incentives income per person increase India industrial industrialisation inequality inputs Kenya labour land LDCs less marginalists Marxist ment migrants Nigeria non-agricultural non-farm OECD organised outlays Pakistan peasant Philippines poor countries population poverty price twists production profits proportion raise rates ratio reduce relative rise rural areas rural poor rural sector rural-urban savings share small farmers social Sri Lanka subsidies surplus Tanzania taxation tion towns townward urban areas urban bias urban-biased urban-rural urbanisation village wages welfare workers