Aerial Interdiction: Air Power and the Land Battle in Three American Wars
DIANE Publishing, 1995 - 432 pages
Examines the practice of air interdiction in three wars: World War II, the Korean War, & the war in Southeast Asia. The author proposes a realistic objective for interdiction: preventing men, equipment, & supplies from reaching the combat area when the enemy needs them & in the amount he requires. Bibliography & index. Contains over 100 charts, tables, maps, & photos.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Aerial Interdiction AHB/BAM Air Attack Air Force's air power air superiority aircraft airfields Allied air forces American ammunition antiaircraft Anzio April artillery August battle beachhead bombing bridges British Cassino Chinese Commando Hunt VII convoys D-day defenses destroyed Diadem Easter Offensive effect enemy enemy's FEAF Fifth Air Force fighter-bombers fighters France front fuel German Gustav Line Heeresgruppe Ibid intelligence interdiction campaign invasion Italian Italy June Kesselring KTB AOK Laos logistical Luftwaffe MAAF MAAF's marshaling yards Mediterranean Messina miles motor transport night North Korean North Vietnamese Northwest African offensive Operation Strangle PACAF Panzer Grenadier Division railroads reconnaissance roads Roll Rome Rommel routes Salerno sensors Seventh Air Force Sicily sorties South Southeast Asia Spaatz Steel Tiger Strategic Air Force supply Tactical Air Force targets Tedder tion tons trucks Tunisia Twelfth Air Force U.S. Air Force U.S. Army United unl unl unl V-E Day Vietnam Zuckerman
Page 231 - I am not prepared to impose from this distance any restriction on military action by the responsible commanders that in their opinion might militate against the success of "Overlord" or cause additional loss of life to our Allied forces of invasion.
Page v - Air operations conducted to destroy, neutralize, or delay the enemy's military potential before it can be brought to bear effectively against friendly forces, at such distance from friendly forces that detailed integration of each air mission with the fire and movement of friendly forces is not required.
Page 216 - ... and could be less effectively supported from the air, but would nevertheless produce the greatest political and strategic impact if it were to succeed. During the opening phase of the battle, the entire striking power of the enemy will of necessity be directed against our forces manning the coast. Only an all-out effort in the construction of fortifications, an unsurpassed effort that will enlist all available manpower and physical resources of Germany and the occupied areas, will be able to...
Page 30 - ... the most important target at a particular time will usually be that target which constitutes the most serious threat to the operations of the supported ground force.
Page 262 - Knaack, Encyclopedia of US Air Force Aircraft and Missile Systems, vol. 1, Post-World War II Fighters, 1945-1973 (Washington, DC: Office of Air Force History, 1978), 55.
Page 268 - Robert F. Futrell, The United States Air Force in Korea, 1950-1953, rev. ed. (Washington, DC: Office of Air Force History, 1983), 480-85; and General OP Weyland, transcript of oral history interview by Dr.
Page 399 - THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS, Washington, DC The Committee on Armed Services, and the Subcommittee on the Department of Defense of the Committee on Appropriations, met jointly, pursuant to recess, at 10 am, in room S-127, US Capitol Building, Hon.
Page 9 - There were few major outbreaks between the end of the Napoleonic Wars and the beginning of World War I.
Page 16 - Air warfare cannot be separated into little packets; it knows no boundaries on land or sea other than those imposed by the radius of action of the aircraft; it is a unity and demands unity of command . " 2 ' CINCPAC allocated Navy targets to the Commander of TF-77 through CINCPACFLT and the Commander of 7th Fleet.