What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Exercising Responsibility for Scholarly Misconduct
Scientific Misconduct Congressional
Academic and Scientific Societies
12 other sections not shown
AAMC academic administrators academic departments academic journals academic misconduct academic profession accused action activities administrators agencies allegations American analysis anomie Association attitudes and beliefs behavior biomedical Braxton chapter Chubin codes colleagues Committee on Science conduct of research conflict Congress congressional departmental detecting deviance deviant behavior discipline discussion duct editors effects ence ethical code federal funds graduate students grants Health Hierarchical linear models Higher Education individual scientists institutions interest investigation involved knowledge laboratory LaFollette manuscript ment miscon misconduct in science misconduct policies National norms oversight peer review plagiarism potential practices Press problems profes programs regulations relationship replication research ethics Research Integrity research misconduct research process role sanctions scholarship misconduct Science and Technology scientific community Scientific Fraud scientific misconduct scientific societies self-regulation social control sociology standards survey tion U.S. House values variables versities Washington whistle-blower wrongdoing Zuckerman