After Genocide: Bringing the Devil to JusticeImagine a criminal justice system that achieves fewer than five convictions per year and spends more than $20 million on each one. By some measures, this would make it the least efficient prosecutorial system in recorded history. Imagine that this same system consistently runs the risk of creating rather than deterring crimes, with few victims or perpetrators believing that it provides fairness, equity, or justice. For many in Rwanda, the former Yugoslavia, Sierra Leone, and elsewhere, this is the reality of the justice that the world community has provided for them in its international criminal tribunals. How did one of the bravest and most optimistic expressions of post-Cold War global power- the provision of justice to those victimized by atrocious crimes--slip into a system in which so many doubt justice is being done, a system that may well exacerbate the problems it was designed to fix? Adam M. Smith, an international lawyer and the son of a Holocaust refugee, has worked on international justice in The Hague, the Balkans, Africa, and Asia. He comprehensively examines the complex, politicized world of international criminal justice from the ground up--from the perspective of those victims and survivors in whose name justice is being provided. Smith reviews the shortcomings of the international justice system in several hot spots, including the following: the former Yugoslavia where, in the eyes of many, a$2 billion investment in international justice has backfired, leaving victims' interests unaddressed and helping to entrench radicalism. Sierra Leone, where the same murderous wartime factions that the international community tried to dismantle remain--in some quarters stronger than ever. Rwanda, where no sector of the post-genocide society believed "their" international tribunal would bring justice, and the court itself has left true reconciliation on the back burner. Sudan and Uganda where the nascent International Criminal Court has replicated many of the problems that plagued the tribunals established for the former Yugoslavia, Sierra Leone, and Rwanda. Are other options available to provide justice without the devastating side effects? Smith illustrates the viability of a counterintuitive, yet historically tested, solutions to dealing with genocide and other atrocities: placing the victims, survivors, and perpetrators center stage and entrusting the challenging and potentially destabilizing work of war crimes justice to the very states affected by the crimes. After Genocide is indispensable reading for voters, policymakers, and citizens, as well as lawyers, academics, and human rights activists who hope that "never again" can become more than a platitude. |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accessed May 17 Africa Agency Zagreb Balkans BBC Summary BBC Worldwide BBC Worldwide Monitoring Belgrade Bosnia Bosnia and Herzegovina bunal charges civil committed conflict convicted Court for Sierra crimes trials Croatia Croatian Supreme Court Croats December defendants despite domestic trials domestic war crimes East Timor ethnic evidence forces former Yugoslavia genocide German Hague HINA News Agency Human Rights Hutus Ibid ICC's ICTR ICTY indictment international community international courts International Criminal Court international criminal justice international justice International Law investigation judges judicial July justice system Kosovo lawyers leaders military Milosevic Milosevic's Muslims Nazi Norac Nuremberg official peace perpetrators political president problems proceedings prosecution prosecutor region Rwanda Rwanda tribunal Sakic Sarajevo Security Council sentenced Serbia Serbs Sierra Leone soldiers Special Court Summary of World Taylor tion tional treaty tribunal's Tudjman Tutsis Ustasha victims violence war crimes World Broadcasts York Yugoslav Yugoslav wars Yugoslavia tribunal