Fads and Fallacies in the Social Sciences
Steven Goldberg has devoted his career to exposing fallacious reasoning, misrepresented fact, and ideological agendas in the social sciences. His scholarly critiques offer alternative, and sometimes controversial, explanations that are notable for their logical integrity and loyalty to empirical reality. Best known for his work in the physiological roots of sex differences, he has also written on a myriad of other subjects, which, as he bluntly states, "are as fallaciously reasoned in professional journals as in the cocktail party conversations that naively repeat the errors first propounded in those journals."
In this new collection of essays he is as lively, interesting, and provocative as ever. In addition to lambasting the fallacies infusing the received wisdom on many issues, he also directly addresses the factors and motivations that underlie the contemporary surrender of the social sciences to the forces of antiscientific ideologies, which subordinate logic and evidence to wish-fulfillment and political goals.
Among the subjects addressed are the validity of intelligence tests, group differences, the death penalty, sex differences in aggression and cognition, the family, abortion, and the nature of modern society. Also included are a couple of polemics, observations on the O. J. Simpson trial, and a moving encomium to his hero, Jackie Robinson.
Goldberg's work has been praised by reviewers as "persuasive and accurate"(Margaret Mead); "coolly, tightly, even brilliantly reasoned" (Morton Kaplan); and "the most significant . . . on the subject in decades" (Murray Rothbard). Readers who appreciate razor-sharp rigor and logical elegance will be richly rewarded by these essays on many of the most hotly contested issues of the social sciences.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
THE EROSION OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES 1
FALLACEO IDEOLOGY IN CONTEMPORARY
6 other sections not shown
ability abortion accept American argue argument attitudes behavior believe black murderers causal claim coprophilia correct correlation course cultural relativism death penalty demonstrate deter discussed doubt Dylan EDTA effect empirical reality environment environmental equal essay evidence example explanation fact factors fallacy feel feminist fetus Freudian Goldberg hereditary heredity heterosexual Highway 61 Revisited homosexuality human ical ideology imply increase Inevitability of Patriarchy inevitable inherent intelligence invoke irrelevant issue kill less likelihood logical male-female difference males and females mathematics meaning merely modern moral murder rate nearly O. J. Simpson obvious one's pathological patriarchy person physiological play political position possible prediction pro-choice psychological psychophysiological question reason relevant render result role scientific scientist sex differences sexual Simpson social sciences society sociology statistical status Steven Goldberg Super Bowl tion true truth Tutsis universal value system variable victim virtually woman women young