What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
2o Bkg affg agent American Nat amount Armstrong assignment Assn bank's Barb Branch Bank Central Nat certified Chap Chemical Nat Citizens City Bank City Nat claim Clark collecting bank Colo Commercial Bank Commercial Nat Conn court creditor debt debtor deposit depositor draft drawee bank endorsement Estate Exchange Bank Farmers figures refer Fourth Nat fund gift holder Ibid insolvent Institution Iowa liability maker Mass Merchants Metropolitan Nat Minn N. J. Eq N. J. Law N. Y. App N. Y. Misc N. Y. Supp National Bank National Park Bank negligence Northwestern Nat Ohio St owner paid payable payee payment receiver recover rule S. W. Ky S. W. Tex savings bank Second Nat Smith stockholders Third Nat Trust U. S. App Union Nat Wend
Page 591 - Where the instrument contains or a person adds to his signature words indicating that he signs for or on behalf of a principal, or in a representative capacity, he is not liable on the instrument if he was duly authorized; but the mere addition of words describing him as an agent, or as filling a representative character, without disclosing his principal, does not exempt him from personal liability.
Page 669 - A deposit by one person of his own money, in his own name as trustee for another, standing alone, does not establish an irrevocable trust during the lifetime of the depositor. It is a tentative trust merely, revocable at will, until the depositor dies or completes the gift in his lifetime by some unequivocal act or declaration such as delivery of the passbook or notice to the beneficiary.
Page 726 - ... of the bill, or that he is better able than the indorsers to detect an alteration in it. The presumption that the drawee is acquainted with the drawer's signature, or able to ascertain whether it is genuine, is reasonable. In most cases it is in conformity with the fact. But to require the drawee to know the handwriting of the residue of the bill, is unreasonable. It would, in most cases, be requiring an impossibility. Such a rule would be not only arbitrary and rigorous but unjust. The drawee...
Page 793 - To warrant such rescission there must be the further fact that it is reasonably apparent to its officers that the concern will presently be unable to meet its obligations as they are likely to mature and will be obliged to suspend its ordinary operation.
Page 758 - The reason of this rule is that the maker is the principal debtor and liable to all the indorsers, whose undertaking is to pay if he does not. If the holder surrenders the money or securities of the maker, he parts with that in which all who have a right to look to the maker for indemnity have a definite interest ; and if his act inflicts loss on them he must stand, as to the money or securities surrendered, in the place of the maker.
Page 684 - ... inter vivos or causa mortis. But the general rule in England and in this country, and particularly in this state, is that any delivery of property which transfers to the donee either the legal or equitable title is sufficient to effectuate a gift...
Page 556 - When a check is taken instead of money, by one acting for others, as was done by the plaintiffs, a delay of presentment for a day, or for any time beyond that, within which, with proper and reasonable diligence, it can be presented, is at the peril of the party thus retaining the check and postponing presentment, as between him and the persons in interest, whom he represents.
Page 766 - A check of itself does not operate as an assignment of any part of the funds to the credit of the drawer with the bank, and the bank is not liable to the holder, unless and until it accepts or certifies the check.
Page 670 - A power of revocation is perfectly consistent with the creation of a valid trust. It does not in any degree affect the legal title to the property. That passes to the donee, and remains vested for the purposes of the trust, notwithstanding the existence of a right to revoke it.
Page 716 - Shipman case that the maker's intention is the controlling consideration, which determines the character of the paper, and that the statutory rule, which gives to paper drawn payable to the order of a fictitious person, and negotiated by the maker, the same validity as paper payable to bearer, applies only when such paper is put into circulation by the maker with knowledge that the name of the payee does not represent a real person.