The Douglas-fir/ninebark Habitat Type in Central Idaho: Succession and ManagementIntermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1989 - Douglas fir - 65 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 29
Page
... FIGURES Page 15. Regeneration efficiency ( RE ) values of shrub canopies and other microsites for tree seedlings in the PSME / PHMA h.t. , PIPO phase ..................... 29 16. Occurrence of natural tree seedlings ( percent ) by tree ...
... FIGURES Page 15. Regeneration efficiency ( RE ) values of shrub canopies and other microsites for tree seedlings in the PSME / PHMA h.t. , PIPO phase ..................... 29 16. Occurrence of natural tree seedlings ( percent ) by tree ...
Page 3
... and Simon ( 1987 ) , Steele and others ( 1981 , 1983 ) . 2S = major seral a = accidental occurrence s = minor seral ( ) = occurs in only part of the phase C = major climax . Burley UTAH Figure 1 - Distribution of the PSME / 3.
... and Simon ( 1987 ) , Steele and others ( 1981 , 1983 ) . 2S = major seral a = accidental occurrence s = minor seral ( ) = occurs in only part of the phase C = major climax . Burley UTAH Figure 1 - Distribution of the PSME / 3.
Page 4
Succession and Management Robert W. Steele, Kathleen Geier-Hayes. Burley UTAH Figure 1 - Distribution of the PSME / PHMA h.t. in central Idaho , PIPO phase ( • ) and PSME phase ( x ) . Climax TIME ( Successional Age ) Most Climax Early ...
Succession and Management Robert W. Steele, Kathleen Geier-Hayes. Burley UTAH Figure 1 - Distribution of the PSME / PHMA h.t. in central Idaho , PIPO phase ( • ) and PSME phase ( x ) . Climax TIME ( Successional Age ) Most Climax Early ...
Page 5
... Figure 3 shows the classification framework derived from figure 2. Shade tolerance is often assumed to be the fac- tor that determines successional amplitude , but , as Minore ( 1979 ) suggests , other competitive factors may be ...
... Figure 3 shows the classification framework derived from figure 2. Shade tolerance is often assumed to be the fac- tor that determines successional amplitude , but , as Minore ( 1979 ) suggests , other competitive factors may be ...
Page 6
... Figure 2 - Relative successional amplitudes of major tree species in the PSME / PHMA h.t. , PIPO phase . Layer Group Pseudotsuga menziesii Pinus ponderosa Populus tremuloides PSME -PSME Layer Group Pseudotsuga menziesii Most n = 33 PIPO ...
... Figure 2 - Relative successional amplitudes of major tree species in the PSME / PHMA h.t. , PIPO phase . Layer Group Pseudotsuga menziesii Pinus ponderosa Populus tremuloides PSME -PSME Layer Group Pseudotsuga menziesii Most n = 33 PIPO ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Amelanchier alnifolia Antennaria racemosa Apocynum androsaemifolium Arnica Aster conspicuus broadcast burning Bromus carinatus CAGE CARU Calamagrostis rubescens canopy cover Carex geyeri Ceanothus velutinus central Idaho CEVE CEVE Choose first condition classification clearcuts climax condition that fits Department of Agriculture disturbance dominant or codominant early seral EPAN EPAN Epilobium angustifolium forage value Forest and Range Forest Service Geier-Hayes habitat type herb layer species herb layer type high coverages incl Lathyrus nevadensis microsite mid-seral moderate Number of stands Ogden Penstemon attenuatus percent PHMA Physocarpus malvaceus Pinus ponderosa PIPO phase plant ponderosa pine poorly represented Populus tremuloides POTR PREM AMAL PREM PREM Prunus emarginata Pseudotsuga menziesii PSME PSME/PHMA h.t. Ribes cereum RICE RICE Salix scouleriana sampled scarification seed source seral stages shrub layer types SPBE SPBE Spiraea betulifolia successional amplitudes Symphoricarpos albus Symphoricarpos oreophilus Thalictrum occidentale THỌC Tree layer type tree seedlings tree species U.S. Department vegetation wildfire