Studies on the Internal Diaspora of the Byzantine Empire
Although ethnicity is a modern concept and would not have been recognized by the Byzantines, throughout its history the Byzantine Empire was a multi-ethnic state. The papers in this volume examine questions of the uniformity and separateness of the various Byzantine populations and the degree and mechanisms of acculturation. The cultural uniformity that the Byzantine church and state pursued through Orthodoxy and the Greek language did not erase all distinct traits of different groups--nor was that their intention. This volume provides examples of the multiple forms of integration and resistance to integration in a society that for a long time functioned as an integral state and an articulated society that accepted diversity.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
accepted according Actes administrative Anatolia appear Arab Armenian Arméniens Armjane authority Basil Bulgarians Byzance Byzantine Byzantine Empire Byzantium capital century Chalcedonian Changes Cheynet Christian church concerned Constantine Constantinople continued court cultural customs Dagron documents eadem early emperor empire ethnic evidence example fact faith foreign formed Gagik given Greek groups History Iberian idem identified imperial important included integration Islam Italy Jews John judged Kazhdan king known late later Latin least letter Manuel mention merchants Michael military movement Muslim nomads observed official origin Paris particular patriarch pattern perhaps period political population position Pouvoir present princes probably provinces question reference regard region remained Roman ruling seal seems Serbs Sicily siècle social society sources suggests tenth century trans translation Venetians եւ