A Theory of Justice for Animals: Animal Rights in a Nonideal World
Are animals worthy recipients of justice? If so, what do we owe them, and what is to be gained by using the language of justice when considering our duties toward them? A Theory of Justice for Animals, written by one of the foremost scholars of animal ethics, argues that not only are animals worthy recipients of justice, but that the language of justice offers a stronger base of claims for animal advocates than does the language of ethics or morality. It also claims that a genuinely political theory of animal rights is incomplete if it does not go beyond the level of ideal theory. This is the first account of animal ethics to use nonideal theory, and it does so to plot a course from where we are now to where we want to be. Advancing what he calls the enhanced sentience position, Robert Garner argues that a valid theory of justice for animals should be rights-based, and that animals have a right to not suffer at the hands of humans. At the same time, he argues that humans have a greater interest in life and liberty than most species of nonhuman animals. Tackling animal ethics as it relates to justice and non-ideal theory, this is a seminal work that will challenge traditional approaches and offer a compelling new vision of animal justice.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
1 IntroductionAnimals Justice and Nonideal Theory
2 Contractarianism Animals and Justice
3 Why Animals Need Justice
4 Indirect Duties Virtue Ethics and Animals
5 The Animal Welfare Ethic
6 Animal Rights and Justice
7 Three Positions Rejected
Other editions - View all
abolitionism abolitionist accept adopt advocates animal ethics animal experimentation animal interests animal protection animal welfare ethic argued argument from marginal Barry Barry’s beneﬁciaries capabilities approach capacities chapter characteristics claim companion animals conception conﬂict contractarian theories deﬁned diﬂ'ICult Donaldson and Kymlicka duties to animals enhanced sentience position excluded factory farming ﬁnd ﬁrst place ﬂourishing Francione harm human beneﬁts human interests humans and animals ideal theory include animals indirect duty view individuals interests of animals justice justiﬁed least liberty lives mals marginal humans McMahan moral obligations moral status moral worth morally signiﬁcant nonhuman animals nonideal theory normative Nussbaum ofanimals ofjustice for animals ofthe political principles ofjustice protection of animals Rawls Rawls’s Rawlsian recipients ofustice reﬂects rights—based Rowlands sacriﬁce scientiﬁc self—interest sense Singer species species—egalitarian version speciesism strand of animal suggests theory ofjustice tion Tom Regan treated treatment of animals utilitarianism veil of ignorance version of animal virtue ethics virtuous whilst