What people are saying - Write a review
LibraryThing ReviewUser Review - curls_99 - LibraryThing
Wow. This book was every bit as exciting as one would imagine it to be. (Because I know sarcasm doesn't work so well in the written, or typed, word - that last sentence was entirely sarcastic.) The ... Read full review
Other editions - View all
The Supreme Court in United States History: Volume Three: 1856-1918
Limited preview - 1999
The Supreme Court in United States History: Volume One: 1789-1821
Limited preview - 1999
Adams Amer Anti-Federalists appointment April argued argument attack Attorney Attorney-General Aurora authority Bench Boston Charleston Chief Justice Marshall Circuit Court citizens Columbian Centinel common law Cong Connecticut Courant Constitution constitutionality Cranch Dallas decided decision District doctrine duty Edmund Randolph Embargo Executive favor February Federal Courts Federalist Federalist paper Fisher Ames Gazette Georgia Government Grand Jury Hamilton impeachment Independent Chronicle James Jefferson John Quincy Adams Joseph Story Judge Chase Judge Iredell Judiciary Judiciary Act July June jurisdiction Kentucky lawyer legislation Legislature letter Madison mandamus Marbury March Marshall's Massachusetts ment National Intelligencer newspapers nomination opinion Papers MSS party Paterson Pennsylvania Pickering Plumer political President principles question Randolph repeal Republican Secretary Senate Sept Sess South Carolina sovereignty statute Supreme Court Term Timothy Pickering tion treaty tribunal unconstitutional Union United United States Attorney Virginia Washington William William Plumer writ wrote York
Page 2 - The life of the law has not been logic: it has been experience. The felt necessities of the time, the prevalent moral and political theories, intuitions of public policy, avowed or unconscious, even the prejudices which judges share with their fellow-men, have had a good deal more to do than the syllogism in determining the rules by which men should be governed.
Page 499 - Resolved, that each branch ought to possess the right of originating acts; that the national legislature ought to be empowered to enjoy the legislative rights vested in Congress by the Confederation, and moreover to legislate in all cases to which the separate states are incompetent or in which the harmony of the United States may be interrupted by the exercise of individual legislation...
Page 6 - ... that all acts of the United States in Congress, made by virtue and in pursuance of the powers hereby, and by the Articles of Confederation, vested in them, and all treaties made and ratified under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the respective States, so far forth as those acts or treaties shall relate to the said States or their citizens ; and that the Judiciary of the several States shall be bound thereby in their decisions, any thing in the respective laws of...
Page 376 - If the legislatures of the several states may, at will, annul the judgments of the courts of the United States, and destroy the rights acquired under those judgments, the Constitution itself becomes a solemn mockery.
Page 24 - It is but a decent respect due to the wisdom, the integrity, and the patriotism of the legislative body by which any law is passed^ to presume in favor of its validity, until its violation of the constitution is proved beyond all reasonable doubt.
Page 396 - The question, whether a law be void for its repugnancy to the constitution, is, at all times, a question of much delicacy, which ought seldom, if ever, to be decided in the affirmative in a doubtful case.
Page 511 - ... the conflicting powers of the government of the Union and of its members, as marked in that Constitution, are to be discussed; and an opinion given, which may essentially influence the great operations of the government. No tribunal can approach such a question without a deep sense of its importance, and of the awful responsibility involved in its decision. But it must be decided peacefully, or remain a source of hostile legislation, perhaps of hostility of a still more serious nature; and if...
Page 447 - States ; that so much of the 25th section of the act of congress to establish the judicial courts of the United States, as extends the appellate jurisdiction of the supreme court to this court, is not in pursuance of the constitution of the United States; that the writ of error, in this...
Page 485 - The sober people of America are weary of the fluctuating policy which has directed the public councils. They have seen with regret and indignation that sudden changes and legislative interferences in cases affecting personal rights, become jobs in the hands of enterprising and influential speculators, and snares to the more industrious and less informed part of the community.