Divine Powers in Late Antiquity
Anna Marmodoro, Irini-Fotini Viltanioti
Oxford University Press, 2017 - History - 288 pages
Is power the essence of divinity, or are divine powers distinct from divine essence? Are they divine hypostases or are they divine attributes? Are powers such as omnipotence, omniscience, etc. modes of divine activity? How do they manifest? In which way can we apprehend them? Is there a multiplicity of gods whose powers fill the cosmos or is there only one God from whom all power(s) derive(s) and whose power(s) permeate(s) everything? These are questions that become central to philosophical and theological debates in Late Antiquity (roughly corresponding to the period second to the sixth centuries). On the one hand, the Pagan Neoplatonic thinkers of this era postulate a complex hierarchy of gods, whose powers express the unlimited power of the ineffable One. On the other hand, Christians proclaim the existence of only one God, one divine power or one "Lord of all powers."
Divided into two main sections, the first part of Divine Powers in Late Antiquity examines aspects of the notion of divine power as developed by the four major figures of Neoplatonism: Plotinus (c. 204-270), Porphyry (c. 234-305), Iamblichus (c.245-325), and Proclus (412-485). It focuses on an aspect of the notion of divine power that has been so far relatively neglected in the literature. Part two investigates the notion of divine power in early Christian authors, from the New Testament to the Alexandrian school (Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Athanasius the Great) and, further, to the Cappadocian Fathers (Basil the Great, Gregory of Nyssa), as well as in some of these authors' sources (the Septuagint, Philo of Alexandria). The traditional view tends to overlook the fact that the Bible, particularly the New Testament, was at least as important as Platonic philosophical texts in the shaping of the early Christian thinking about the Church's doctrines. Whilst challenging the received interpretation by redressing the balance between the Bible and Greek philosophical texts, the essays in the second section of this book nevertheless argue for the philosophical value of early Christian reflections on the notion of divine power. The two groups of thinkers that each of the sections deal with (the Platonic-Pagan and the Christian one) share largely the same intellectual and cultural heritage; they are concerned with the same fundamental questions; and they often engage in more or less public philosophical and theological dialogue, directly influencing one another.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
6%uapus action activity Amand de Mendieta/Rudberg argues Aristotle Aristotle's Athanasius Bardaisan Basil body Cambridge Cels Chaldean Oracles chapter Christ Christological Comm Commentary concept contemplation Corinthians created creation Cronus Demiurge Dionysus divine dunamis divine power doctrine Early Christian earth elements Enneads entities Father Galen Genesis God's dunamis God's power God’s gods Greek Gregory of Nyssa Gregory's Hermas Hesiod human Iamblichus idea Ignatius Ilaria L. E. immaterial Intellect intelligible interpretation Justin Late Antiquity Logos Marmodoro material matter Mendieta/Rudberg 1997 metaphysical Myst nature Neoplatonic notion object ontological Origen Orphic Oxford passage Paul Paul's Phanes Philo philosophical Platonic Platonists Plotinus Porphyry Porphyry's principles Proclus Protogonus puév qualities Ramelli Rhapsodies ritual sceptre sense Septuagint soul statue Stoics term texts Theogony theology theurgy things thinking thought Timaeus Toſs toū Toujoets Töv Tów Tpós tradition Tryph Tús Túv uév University Press Uranus Viltanioti wisdom yöp Zeus