The Quest for the Plausible Jesus: The Question of CriteriaShould the dissimilarity between Jesus and early Christianity or between Jesus and Judaism be the central criteria for the historical Jesus? Gerd Theissen and Dagmar Winter argue that the criterion of dissimilarity does not do justice to the single most important result of more than two-hundred years of Jesus research: that the historical Jesus belongs to both Judaism and Christianity. The two authors propose a criterion of historical plausibility so that historical phenomenon under question can be considered authentic so long as it can be plausibly understood in its Jewish context and also facilitates a plausible explanation for its later effects in Christian history. This book is a cooperative project between Dagmar Winter and Gerd Theissen and represents the fruit of many years of their research on the historical Jesus. |
Contents
Aspects of the Quest for Criteria | 1 |
The Criterion of Dissimilarity within the Framework | 10 |
of the Criterion of Dissimilarity | 17 |
b Motives Related to Theories of Historical Science | 24 |
a Introduction | 42 |
37 | 58 |
The History of the Criterion of Dissimilarity | 76 |
b The Picture of Jesus in the Work of Wilhelm Bousset | 89 |
A New Formulation of the Criteria | 210 |
Criteria in Jesus Research and the Wide Ugly Ditch | 226 |
The Problem of Historical Source Criticism | 233 |
The Problem of Historical Relativism | 242 |
A Collection of Formulations | 261 |
1878 | 267 |
1900 | 269 |
1912 | 275 |
ii The Impossibility of LifeofJesus Research | 100 |
of Dissimilarity and the Discussion of the 1950s | 122 |
c The Criterion of Dissimilarity and the Picture | 136 |
ii The Genesis of the Third Questa Brief Sketch | 144 |
b The Criterion of Dissimilarity in the Discussion | 153 |
c The Picture of Jesus in the Work | 163 |
The Criterion of Historical Plausibility | 172 |
1955 | 279 |
1965 | 285 |
1971 | 290 |
1983 | 302 |
317 | |
337 | |