The King James Only Controversy: Can You Trust the Modern Translations?Answering those who claim that only the King James Version is the Word of God, The King James Only Controversy examines allegations that modern translators conspired to corrupt Scripture and lead believers away from true Christian faith. In a readable and responsible style, author James White traces that development of Bible translations old and new and investigates the differences between new versions and the Authorized Version of 1611. |
Contents
Foreword by Dr Mike Baird | 11 |
PART ONETHE KING JAMES ONLY CONTROVERSY | 21 |
PART TWOTHE TEXTUAL DATA | 311 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Age Bible Versions Alexandrian ancient argument Bart Ehrman believe Beza biblical Bruce Metzger Byzantine text-type century Christian church cited Colossians Comma Johanneum conspiracy copy Corinthians corrupt defenders deity of Christ deletion edition Ehrman English Ephesians Erasmus Erasmus's error evidence example fact faith Father follow Gail Riplinger God’s Word gospel Greek manuscripts Greek New Testament Greek term Hebrew hence Holy Spirit Ibid inerrant inspired Isaiah John King James Bible King James Version KJV Only advocates KJV Onlyism KJV rendering KJV translators KJV’s language Latin look Lord Jesus Christ Luke Majority Text Mark Matthew means modern texts modern translations modern versions NASB NKJV Old Testament original passage Peter Ruckman phrase reading reason reference Revelation Riplinger Romans scholars scribes Scripture Septuagint Stephanus Testament text Textual Criticism textual variants Textus Receptus theological things thou tion truth uncial unto verse Vulgate Westcott and Hort writing