What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
action administrative anti-trust appeal apply authority Bank capital cent charter combination commission common carrier common law compensation competition Congress constitutional contract cost Dartmouth College decision declared doctrine due process economic effect eminent domain employer enacted enforce established exercise existing fact Federal foreign corporation Fourteenth Amendment franchise granted held Illinois individual industrial injury interest interstate commerce Interstate Commerce Commission investigation judges judicial jurisdiction Justice Kansas labor land legislation legislature liability liberty license limited Louisiana manufacture matter ment Minnesota Missouri monopoly North Carolina North Dakota operation opinion organization Pennsylvania person police power practical present principle prohibition protection public utilities purpose question railroad railway rates reasonable regulation restraint of trade result rules Sect secure Senator Cumm1ns Sherman social statute Supreme Court taxation tion trust unconstitutional United violation wages Wisconsin York
Page 643 - It shall be the duty of the various district attorneys, under the direction of the Attorney General of the United States, to prosecute for the recovery of forfeitures.
Page 657 - If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Act shall, for any reason, be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph, or part thereof directly involved in the controversy in which such judgment shall have been rendered.
Page 642 - Any person may be compelled to appear and depose, and to produce documentary evidence, in the same manner as witnesses may be compelled to appear and testify and produce documentary evidence before the Commission as hereinbefore provided.
Page 645 - That it shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, to lease or make a sale or contract for sale of goods, wares, merchandise, machinery, supplies, or other commodities, whether patented or unpatented...
Page 645 - That any person who shall be injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws may sue therefor in any district court of the United States in the district in which the defendant resides or is found or has an agent, without respect to the amount in controversy, and shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained, and the cost of suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee.
Page 655 - ... attending at any place where any such person or persons may lawfully be, for the purpose of peacefully obtaining or communicating information, or from peacefully persuading any person to work or to abstain from working; or from ceasing to patronize or to employ any party to such dispute, or from recommending, advising, or persuading others by peaceful and lawful means so to do...
Page 657 - That this right shall not apply to contempts committed in the presence of the court or so near thereto as to interfere directly with the administration of justice...
Page 644 - ... unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, either directly or indirectly, to discriminate in price between different purchasers of commodities of like grade and quality...
Page 454 - A person has no property, no vested interest, in any rule of the common law. That is only one of the forms of municipal law, and is no more sacred than any other. Rights of property which have been created by the common law cannot be taken away without due process ; but the law itself, as a rule of conduct, may be changed at the will, or even at the whim, of the legislature, unless prevented by constitutional limitations. Indeed, the great office of statutes is to remedy defects in the common law...