Studies in British Military Thought: Debates with Fuller and Liddell Hart
John Frederick Charles Fuller (1878-1966), British soldier, military analyst, and war historian, is considered the father of modern armored (tank) warfare-first as planner of the attack at Cambrai in November 1917, and then as author of a number of works that challenged traditional British military thought. His ideas were resisted in his own country but had a major impact on German and Soviet military doctrine. Sir Basil Liddell Hart (1895-1970) was also a British military historian and analyst of note and authored influential military histories covering figures from Scipio Africanus to Field Marshal Rommel. In the twelve analytical essays in Studies in British Military Thought Brian Holden Reid examines these two figures whose ideas have influenced the interpretation of events in military history from antiquity to the Cold War. He compares and contrasts their views on tactics, operational art and strategy, and war as a social phenomenon. Additionally, he discusses the radically different temperaments of the two and shows how their differences shaped their work in important ways. In so doing, he continues to bring their ideas to students and practitioners of modern warfare and raises fundamental issues concerning the nature of war. Brian Holden Reid, acknowledged on both sides of the Atlantic as the leading expositor of the ideas of General Fuller, is Senior Lecturer in War Studies at King's College, University of London. He is the author of J. F. C. Fuller: Military Thinker.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Fullers Theory of Mechanized Warfare
Fuller and the Revival of Classical
Fuller and the Revolution in British Military Thought
Fuller and the Operational Level of
Fuller and the Theory and Practice of Strategy
The Perils of Prediction
British Military Intellectuals and the American
T E Lawrence and Liddell Hart
Fuller Liddell Hart and the Odyssey of British
British Military Intellectuals and the Lure of Antiquity
achieved action advance Alexander American analysis appeared approach argued argument armed armored army attack attempt battle become believed Britain British Caesar campaigns chapter Civil claimed College command conduct considered critical decisive defensive direct economy effect enemy enemy's example fascism field fighting forces Foundations Fuller and Liddell future Generalship German Grant Hart's historians ideas important indirect infantry influence intellectual interest kind later Lawrence Lawrence's Lectures less Liddell Hart Papers limited lines London Major March Maurice means mechanization methods military mobility moral Mosley move movement never object offensive officers once operational organization perhaps political possible Press principles problem rear result Science Scipio Second secure soldiers Staff strategy successful suggested tactical tank theory thinker thinking thought tion victory warfare wars weapons World writing wrote