 God's ordinance ; the other was, that subjects were not bound to obey their princes if they commanded unlawful things, but that they might resist their princes, and were not ever bound to suffer.  The History of the Kirk of Scotland - Page 261by David Calderwood - 1843 - 566 pagesFull view - About this book
 | Thomas M'Crie - Calvinists - 1813 - 502 pages
...affirmed, that men might, resist the persons, and yet «ot offend God's ordinance:. The other was/ that subjects were not bound to obey their princes...their princes, and were not ever bound to suffer." Knox said that the Secretary ha4 given an exact statement of his sentiments. " Hwr will you prove your... | |
 | David Calderwood - 1843 - 610 pages
...and yitt not offend God's ordinance. This is the first. The other yee had no time to explaine. Hut this methought yee meant, That subjects were not bound..." How will ye prove your divisioun and difference ?' said Lethington; " and that the persoun placed in authoritie may be resisted, and God's ordinance... | |
 | Thomas M'Crie - Bothwell Bridge, Battle of, Scotland, 1679 - 1846 - 524 pages
...other was, that subjects were not bun. id to obey their princes if they commanded unlawful tilings, hut that they might resist their princes, and were not ever bound to suffer." Knox said that the Secretary had given an exact statement of his sentiments. " How will you prove your... | |
 | Thomas M'Crie - Reformation - 1855 - 530 pages
...and ye affirmed that men might resist the persons and yet not offend God's ordinance ; the other was, that subjects were not bound to obey their princes...their princes, and were not ever bound to suffer." Knox said that the secretary had given a correct statement of his sentiments. " How will you prove... | |
 | John Knox - Reformation - 1950 - 512 pages
...against God's ordinance. This is the one ; the other ye had no time to explain ; but this, methought, ye meant, that subjects were not bound to obey their...princes, and were not ever bound to suffer." " In very deed," said the other, " ye have rightly both marked my words, and understood my mind ; for of... | |
 | John Knox - History - 1994 - 308 pages
...against God's ordinance. This is the one; the other ye had no time to explain, but this methought ye meant: that subjects were not bound to obey their...they commanded unlawful things, but that they might refuse their princes and were not ever bound to suffer.' 'In very deed', said the other, ^e have righdy... | |
 | David W. Hall - History - 2005 - 512 pages
...view that "men might disobey the persons [princes] and not offend against God's ordinance . . . [and] that subjects were not bound to obey their princes if they commanded unlawful things, and that they might resist them lawfully without fear." In response to the query, "will you make subjects... | |
| |
