The choices justices make
The Choices Justices Make argues convincingly that Supreme Court justices are policy-makers who strategically select courses of action by weighing not only their own preferences, but also the actions they expect from their colleagues on the Court, Congress, and the president.Enriched with unique data, stories, and internal documents culled from four justices' private papers, this book makes a strong case for the factors that hold sway over justices as they decide which cases to accept, how to vote in conference, and how to word their written opinions.
4 pages matching conference discussion in this book
Results 1-3 of 4
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
CHAPTER one A Strategic Account of Judicial Decisions
CHAPTER TWO Justices as Policy Seekers
CHAPTER three Strategic Interaction
3 other sections not shown
actions affirm agenda Amendment amicus curiae attempt attorneys believe Blackmun Brennan Jr Burger Court Caldeira Chapter Chief Justice Burger choices circulated Civil Rights claim colleagues conference discussion conference vote congressional constitutional Court decision Craig decided denial deny Dissenting opinion Douglas draft Eskridge example exclusionary rule favor federal filed files of Justices government actors Harold ideal point important institutions issue Jack Knight Jeffrey join Journal of Political judicial decision Justice Brennan Justice William landmark Lee Epstein legislation legitimacy Lewis F lower court majority opinion Marbury Marshall memo merits Note O'Connor opinion assignment opinion writer outcome percent policy preferences Powell precedent preferred position question rational basis Rehnquist reverse Rule of Four scholars Segal separation of powers Spaeth stare decisis Stevens Stewart strategic account strategic behavior strict scrutiny suggest Table term tices tion U.S. Constitution U.S. Supreme Court United voted to grant Washington White writing