Schiller, Hegel, and Marx: State, Society, and the Aesthetic Ideal of Ancient Greece
All three believed that the modern world could be remade according to this model, though none succeeded in his endeavor. At times Schiller seemed to recognize the failure of the model; in his mature writing Hegel dropped the model; and Marx, as he grew older, fundamentally modified the model. Nevertheless, focusing upong their attempts and failures allows an explanation of certain aspects of one of the fundamental concerns of current Marx studies: Marx's humanism and the relationship between his earlier and later thought.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Schiller, Hegel, and Marx: State, Society, and the Aesthetic Ideal of ...
Philip J. Kain
Limited preview - 1982
1844 Manuscripts activity actual Aesth Aesthetic Education alienation and estrangement ancient Greece ancient world argues beauty become Capital CHPR Christianity citizen civil society Comments on Mill communist society concept of alienation consciousness division of labor Engels enjoyment exchange economy exchangeability of function existence external fetishism ﬁnally ﬁnd ﬁrst freedom German Ideology GKPO goal Gotha Greece Greek Grundrisse harmony Hegel History human essence individual individual’s Karl Marx lead to estrangement longer man’s Manifesto Marx says means modern world Nohl object objectiﬁcation occur one’s Phenomenology Philosophy of Right political positive alienation powers and capacities production proletariat rational realized realm Realphilosophie reconciliation Religion Schiller scientiﬁc self-consciousness sense sensuous separation shift social species species-being speciﬁc spirit Stage sublime supp T. M. Knox trans transformed unity with nature universality vols Werke whole worker writings York Young Marx