The Vampire of the Continent

Front Cover
Jackson Press, 1916 - Germany - 225 pages
1 Review
 

What people are saying - Write a review

User Review - Flag as inappropriate

I am going to review this book because it is an historically important artifact. Titled, "The Vampire of Europe" it is an attack on England and England's successful foreign policy of playing one European power against another in order to advance English interests. It makes the case that England has sucked the life out of Europe to enrich itself.
There is a lot of historical fact to this. England's greatest Kings and Queens are praised in English history for their ability to play the powers of Europe against one another to first protect English Liberty and later promote the British Empire. England is convicted, by her own praise of her own Leaders of the crimes this book acuses her of.
Still, politics and war are dirty games. The European countries were playing the same games with more or less success, and used England as an ally in their own fights for power and success. It is rather bad sportsmanship to condemn England for doing what everyone else was doing.
What I reallly like about it is that it is a perfect counter argument to anti-semitism and "The Protocols of Zion". England banished all Jews from her soil after the First Crusade and refused to allow a single Jew to set foot on English soil till the 18th or 19th century. So, while England was successfully playing the Vampire of Europe, and successfully manipulating the world to its own ends, it did so in the total absence of any Jewish influence at all. This proves clearly the falsehood of the idea of Jews running the world. There is no World Jewish Conspiracy. The Jews have never been anything but beggars at the table of the great powers of Europe.
 

Contents

I
v
II
1
III
15
IV
29
V
40
VI
51
VII
78
VIII
101
IX
121
X
132
XI
155
XII
171
XIII
178
XIV
197
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page 206 - But if a situation were to be forced upon us in which peace could only be preserved by the surrender of the great and beneficent position Britain has won by centuries of heroism and achievement, by allowing Britain to be treated, where her interests were vitally affected, as if she were of no account in the Cabinet of nations, then I say emphatically that peace at that price would be a humiliation intolerable for a great country like ours to endure.
Page 206 - I would make great sacrifices to preserve peace. I conceive that nothing would justify a disturbance of international good will except questions of the gravest national moment. But if a situation were to be forced upon us in which peace could only be preserved by the surrender of the great and beneficent position Britain has...
Page 32 - French school of historical scholars, at the end of the seventeenth and the beginning of the eighteenth century...
Page 21 - We do not go to war for sentimental reasons. I doubt if we ever did. War is the outcome of commercial quarrels; it has for its aims the forcing of commercial conditions by the sword on our antagonists, conditions which we consider necessary to commercially benefit us. We give all sorts of reasons for war, but at the bottom of them all is commerce.
Page 21 - A million petty disputes build up the greatest cause of war the world has ever seen. If Germany were extinguished tomorrow, the day after tomorrow there is not an Englishman in the world who would not be richer.
Page 70 - If, therefore, we compare this year of war with former years of peace, we shall, in the produce of our revenue, and in the extent of our commerce, behold a spectacle at once paradoxical, inexplicable, and astonishing...
Page 21 - if Germany were extinguished to-morrow, the day after to-morrow there is not an Englishman in the world who would not be the richer. Nations have fought for years over a city or right of succession. Must they not fight for two hundred and fifty million pounds of yearly commerce ?" What does the "extinction
Page 69 - Europe, made it inexpedient to withdraw her people from the ranks of labor, at a time when the working classes of other nations were being drained for the armies. For these reasons great operations on land, or a conspicuous share in the continental campaigns became, if not absolutely impossible to Great Britain, at least clearly unadvisable. It was economically wiser, for the purposes of the coalitions, that she should be controlling the sea, supporting the commerce of the world, making money and...
Page 54 - England declared war four days later. The principal effect, therefore, of the Armed Neutrality upon the war was to add the colonies and commerce of Holland to the prey of English cruisers. The additional enemy was of small account to Great Britain, whose geographical position effectually blocked the junction of the Dutch fleet with those of her other enemies. The possessions of Holland fell everywhere, except when saved by the French ; while a bloody but wholly uninstructive battle between...
Page 41 - ... any rivals, passed unmolested over the seas. In one year they are said to have taken from French commerce 7,000,000 sterling. Yet this sea power, which might have seized French and Spanish colonies, made few conquests from want of unity and persistence in the direction given them.

Bibliographic information