Forensic Neuropsychology: A Scientific Approach
Glenn J. Larrabee
Oxford University Press, 2005 - Medical - 479 pages
With increasing frequency neuropsychologists are being asked to serve as experts in court cases where judgements must be made as to the cause of, and prognosis for brain diseases and injuries. This book describes the application of neuropsychology to legal issues in both the civil and criminal courts. It emphasizes a scientific basis of neuropsychology. All of the contributors are recognized as scientist-clinicians. The chapters cover common forensic issues such as appropriate scientific reasoning, the assessment of malingering, productive attorney-neuropsychologist interactions, and ethics. Also, covered are the determination of damages in personal injury litigation, including pediatric brain injury, mild, moderate, and severe traumatic brain injury in adults (with an introduction to life care planning); neurotoxic injury; and forensic assessment of medically unexplained symptoms. Civil competencies in the elderly persons with dementia are addressed a separate chapter, and two chapters deal with the assessment of competency and responsibility in criminal forensic neuropsychology. This volume will be an invaluable resource for neuropsychologists, attorneys, neurologists, clinical psychologists, psychiatrists, and their students and trainees.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
tions have helped see this work to completion First I acknowledge the assis
Principles of Productive
12 other sections not shown
ability activity addition American approach Archives assessment associated attorney battery behavior Binder capacity cause changes chapter chronic Clinical cognitive competency considered court criminal damage decision defendant deficits demonstrated determine developed diagnosis disability disease disorder effects et al ethical evaluation evidence examination example expert exposure fact factors findings forensic function head injury impairment important indicated individual issue Journal Larrabee litigants malingering Marson mean measures memory mental methods mild moderate MTBI neurological neuropsychological test normal noted opinion outcome patients performance plaintiff potential practice predictive present Press problems Psychiatry psychological questions reasonable records referred regarding requires response rule sample Scale scores sensitivity settings severe significant specific standard studies subjects symptoms Table testimony tion traumatic brain injury treatment trial understanding validity witness York